145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9456531)
1. A physical method for separating spermatozoa from epithelial cells in sexual assault evidence.
Chen J; Kobilinsky L; Wolosin D; Shaler R; Baum H
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 9456531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Horsman KM; Barker SL; Ferrance JP; Forrest KA; Koen KA; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2005 Feb; 77(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 15679339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Filtration based DNA preparation for sexual assault cases.
Garvin AM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1084-7. PubMed ID: 14535671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laser microdissection separation of pure spermatozoa from epithelial cells for short tandem repeat analysis.
Sanders CT; Sanchez N; Ballantyne J; Peterson DA
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):748-57. PubMed ID: 16882215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Validation of Differential Extraction Kit in forensic sexual assault cases].
Wu D; Cao Y; Xu Y; He BF; Bi G; Zhou HG
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 25(6):440-2. PubMed ID: 20225622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A demonstration of spermatozoa on vaginal swabs after complete destruction of the vaginal cell deposits.
Iwasaki M; Kubo S; Ogata M; Nakasono I
J Forensic Sci; 1989 May; 34(3):659-64. PubMed ID: 2738565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel histological technique for distinguishing between epithelial cells in forensic casework.
French CE; Jensen CG; Vintiner SK; Elliot DA; McGlashan SR
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jun; 178(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18358655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Differentiation of epithelial cell types by cell diameter].
Evers H; Birngruber CG; Ramsthaler F; Müller U; Brück S; Verhoff MA
Arch Kriminol; 2011; 228(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 21850882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A proof of principal study on the use of direct PCR of semen and spermatozoa and development of a differential isolation protocol for use in cases of alleged sexual assault.
Tobe SS; Swaran YC; Dennany L; Sibbing U; Schulze Johann K; Welch L; Vennemann M
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 27832353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Capillary zone electrophoresis separation and collection of spermatozoa for the forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Wright SN; Huge BJ; Dovichi NJ
Electrophoresis; 2020 Aug; 41(15):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 32453860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Determination of group affiliation of isolated spermatozoa after separation from squamous epithelium cells].
Sosenkova LV; Sidorov VL; Maiatskaia MV; Kurdzhieva OB; Gurtovaia SV
Sud Med Ekspert; 2004; 47(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 15108389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of a Y chromosome probe as an aid in the forensic proof of sexual assault.
Dziegelewski M; Simich JP; Rittenhouse-Olson K
J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):601-4. PubMed ID: 12051344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of body fluid mixtures by mtDNA sequencing: An inter-laboratory study of the GEP-ISFG working group.
Montesino M; Salas A; Crespillo M; Albarrán C; Alonso A; Alvarez-Iglesias V; Cano JA; Carvalho M; Corach D; Cruz C; Di Lonardo A; Espinheira R; Farfán MJ; Filippini S; García-Hirschfeld J; Hernández A; Lima G; López-Cubría CM; López-Soto M; Pagano S; Paredes M; Pinheiro MF; Rodríguez-Monge AM; Sala A; Sóñora S; Sumita DR; Vide MC; Whittle MR; Zurita A; Prieto L
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 16899347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Isolating sperm cells by laser capture microdissection technique from mixture sample].
Liu F; Wang J; Yu LJ; Guo JZ; Gao JW; Jiao ZP; Tang H
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 27(1):33-5, 42. PubMed ID: 21542224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhanced recovery of spermatozoa and comprehensive lysis of epithelial cells from sexual assault samples having a low cell counts or aged up to one year.
Lounsbury JA; Nambiar SM; Karlsson A; Cunniffe H; Norris JV; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24315594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extraction of DNA from forensic-type sexual assault specimens using simple, rapid sonication procedures.
Crouse CA; Ban JD; D'Alessio JK
Biotechniques; 1993 Oct; 15(4):641-4, 646, 648. PubMed ID: 7902722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three sperm preparation media.
Sharma RK; Seifarth K; Garlak D; Agarwal A
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999; 44(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10435917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of matrix filtration of low-quality boar semen doses on sperm quality.
Bussalleu E; Pinart E; Rivera MM; Briz M; Sancho S; Yeste M; Casas I; Fàbrega A; Rigau T; Rodriguez-Gil JE; Bonet S
Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Jun; 44(3):499-503. PubMed ID: 19192214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Separation of sperm by micromanipulator from unusual forensic sample - case report].
Vlček D; Vaněk D; Mikeš J; Kováč M; Kállay D
Soud Lek; 2013 Apr; 58(2):16-8. PubMed ID: 23641722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
