299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9456542)
1. Urine drug testing for social service agencies in Nova Scotia, Canada.
Fraser AD
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):194-6. PubMed ID: 9456542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urine drug testing for social service agencies. A Canadian experience.
Fraser AD
Clin Lab Med; 1998 Dec; 18(4):705-11. PubMed ID: 9891609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 6-year experience with urine drug testing by family service agencies in Nova Scotia, Canada.
Fraser AD
Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Oct; 121(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 11566417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modification of screening immunoassays to detect sub-threshold concentrations of cocaine, cannabinoids, and opiates in urine: use for detecting maternal and neonatal drug exposures.
Hattab EM; Goldberger BA; Johannsen LM; Kindland PW; Ticino F; Chronister CW; Bertholf RL
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2000 Jan; 30(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 10678589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of ONTRAK TESTCUP, abuscreen ONTRAK, abuscreen ONLINE, and GC/MS urinalysis test results.
Crouch DJ; Cheever ML; Andrenyak DM; Kuntz DJ; Loughmiller DL
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9456522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of meconium, maternal urine and neonatal urine for detection of maternal drug use during pregnancy.
Wingert WE; Feldman MS; Kim MH; Noble L; Hand I; Yoon JJ
J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 8113697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concentrations of unconjugated morphine, codeine and 6-acetylmorphine in urine specimens from suspected drugged drivers.
Ceder G; Jones AW
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):366-8. PubMed ID: 11908609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry versus immunoassay drug testing in pain patients.
Pesce A; Rosenthal M; West R; West C; Crews B; Mikel C; Almazan P; Latyshev S
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 20495592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of psychoactive substances in truck drivers in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region (France).
Labat L; Fontaine B; Delzenne C; Doublet A; Marek MC; Tellier D; Tonneau M; Lhermitte M; Frimat P
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jan; 174(2-3):90-4. PubMed ID: 17418990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of drugs of abuse in urine of drivers involved in road accidents in France: a collaborative study.
Marquet P; Delpla PA; Kerguelen S; Bremond J; Facy F; Garnier M; Guery B; Lhermitte M; Mathé D; Pelissier AL; Renaudeau C; Vest P; Seguela JP
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):806-11. PubMed ID: 9670503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience with urine drug testing by the Correctional Service of Canada.
Fraser AD; Zamecnik J; Keravel J; McGrath L; Wells J
Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Sep; 121(1-2):16-22. PubMed ID: 11516882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of drugs used in cases of alleged sexual assault.
ElSohly MA; Salamone SJ
J Anal Toxicol; 1999; 23(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 10369321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Poppy seed ingestion as a contributing factor to opiate-positive urinalysis results: the Pacific perspective.
Selavka CM
J Forensic Sci; 1991 May; 36(3):685-96. PubMed ID: 1856638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Methodology and problems in the study of drugs of abuse in urine].
Sieghart W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Jun; 98(13):411-6. PubMed ID: 2875564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid screening of drugs of abuse and their metabolites by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: application to urinalysis.
Strano-Rossi S; Molaioni F; Rossi F; Botrè F
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2005; 19(11):1529-35. PubMed ID: 15880665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Workplace drug testing in Italy: findings about second-stage testing.
Vignali C; Stramesi C; Morini L; San Bartolomeo P; Groppi A
Drug Test Anal; 2015 Mar; 7(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 24652693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Substance abuse monitoring by the Correctional Service of Canada.
Fraser AD; Zamecnik J
Ther Drug Monit; 2002 Feb; 24(1):187-91. PubMed ID: 11805743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
Lu NT; Taylor BG
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):106-16. PubMed ID: 15899564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical issues associated with urine testing of substances of abuse.
Eskridge KD; Guthrie SK
Pharmacotherapy; 1997; 17(3):497-510. PubMed ID: 9165553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Substance abuse testing of urine by GC/MS in scanning mode evaluated by proficiency studies, TLC/GC, and EMIT.
Gibb RP; Cockerham H; Goldfogel GA; Lawson GM; Raisys VA
J Forensic Sci; 1993 Jan; 38(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 8381160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
