These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9456630)
1. Method to verify the accuracy of model surgery and prediction tracing. Omura T; Glickman RS; Super S Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 9456630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery? Sharifi A; Jones R; Ayoub A; Moos K; Walker F; Khambay B; McHugh S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1089-93. PubMed ID: 18760569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Techniques for achieving three-dimensional positioning of the maxilla applied in conjunction with the Göttingen concept. Schwestka-Polly R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Luhr HG Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 9835824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictability of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery using "piggyback" intermediate splints. Stefanova N; Stella JP Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11307219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical cephalometric prediction tracing for the alteration of the occlusal plane by means of rotation of the maxillomandibular complex. Reyneke JP Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 10337251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prototype articulator for planning orthognathic and craniofacial surgery. Angelillo JC; Georgiade NG; Rabe WC J Oral Surg; 1977 Oct; 35(10):847-9. PubMed ID: 269238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system. 2. Accuracy of occlusal wafers. Paul PE; Barbenel JC; Walker FS; Khambay BS; Moos KF; Ayoub AF Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 22047954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system. Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical experiences of digital model surgery and the rapid-prototyped wafer for maxillary orthognathic surgery. Kim BC; Lee CE; Park W; Kim MK; Zhengguo P; Yu HS; Yi CK; Lee SH Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Mar; 111(3):278-85.e1. PubMed ID: 20692187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of video imaging prediction in soft tissue outcome after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Lu CH; Ko EW; Huang CS J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 12618973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems. Aharon PA; Eisig S; Cisneros GJ Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 9456619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system: 1. Accuracy of cast orientation. Paul PE; Barbenel JC; Walker FS; Khambay BS; Moos KF; Ayoub AF Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 22047955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of face-bow transfer: effect on surgical prediction and postsurgical result. Ellis E; Tharanon W; Gambrell K J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jun; 50(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 1593315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of 3 methods of face-bow transfer recording: implications for orthognathic surgery. Gateno J; Forrest KK; Camp B J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):635-40; discussion 640-1. PubMed ID: 11381385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]