178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9457025)
1. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study.
Lund DI; Sandler PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 9457025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Masseter muscle thickness as a predictive variable in treatment outcome of the twin-block appliance and masseteric thickness changes during treatment.
Kiliaridis S; Mills CM; Antonarakis GS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Nov; 13(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 21040463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive value of molar bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment outcomes.
Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 21411476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationships.
Fernandes ÁF; Brunharo IH; Quintão CC; Costa MG; de Oliveira-Costa MR
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 20877731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator.
Rushforth CD; Gordon PH; Aird JC
Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10420247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.
Jena AK; Duggal R
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 20050741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.
Siara-Olds NJ; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger J; Bayirli B
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 19852635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.
Chaiyongsirisern A; Rabie AB; Wong RW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19852598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
