178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9457025)
21. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Centroid analysis of twin-block appliance treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Trenouth MJ
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16779975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Late adult skeletofacial growth after adolescent Herbst therapy: a 32-year longitudinal follow-up study.
Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Hashemi K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 25533068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.
Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion.
Das UM; Reddy D
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the variable anchorage straightwire technique using Ricketts' growth prediction.
Parikakis KA; Moberg S; Hellsing E
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18832190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Treatment effects of R-appliance and Fränkel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Showkatbakhsh R; Castaldo MI; Jamilian A; Padricelli G; Fahimi Hanzayi M; Cappabianca S; Perillo L
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 23597214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of mandibular tongue cribs on dentoskeletal changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
Meibodi SE; Meybodi SA; Meybodi EM
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 20209173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.
Spalj S; Mroz Tranesen K; Birkeland K; Katic V; Pavlic A; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():4861924. PubMed ID: 28203569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects.
Ghodke S; Utreja AK; Singh SP; Jena AK
Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):68. PubMed ID: 25534004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Sidhu MS; Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS
Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7786859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
