These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9457136)
1. Impact of differences in amalgam restorations on examination standardization. Cobb DS J Dent Educ; 1997 Dec; 61(12):938-40. PubMed ID: 9457136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Experiences of a consulting examiner. Anderson AW J Dent Educ; 1997 Dec; 61(12):934-7. PubMed ID: 9457135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dental students' ability to assess their performance in a preclinical restorative course: comparison of students' and faculty members' assessments. Tuncer D; Arhun N; Yamanel K; Çelik Ç; Dayangaç B J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26034030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school. Ottenga ME; Mjör I Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 17910231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry. McComb D J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 71(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 15955263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Placement of posterior resin restorations should be limited to dentists. Benjamin GC N Y State Dent J; 2008 Jan; 74(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 18404829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Bellfirm P for dental amalgam (2). Clinical application of Bellfirm P for posterior restorations]. Kawahara H; Nakamura M; Ikeda H; Kawata Y; Hikari S; Maeda T; Sakaguchi K; Iseki T; Yokoyama A Shikai Tenbo; 1983 Mar; 61(3):487-98. PubMed ID: 6573791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardization and calibration in the evaluation of clinical performance. Courts FJ J Dent Educ; 1997 Dec; 61(12):947-50. PubMed ID: 9457138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of a short training program on the clinical examination of dental restorations. McAndrew R; Chadwick B; Treasure ET Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 21702675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement Among Dental Students, Peer Assessors, and Tutor in Assessing Students' Competence in Preclinical Skills. Foley JI; Richardson GL; Drummie J J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1320-4. PubMed ID: 26522637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [6-month clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations]. Katsatos I; Poulia-Prompona S; Kostes I Odontostomatol Proodos; 1974; 28(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 4211747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The teaching of Class I and II restorations in primary molars: a survey of North American dental schools. Guelmann M; Mjör IA; Jerrell GR Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 11699164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Curriculum time compared to clinical procedures in amalgam and composite posterior restorations in U.S. dental schools: a preliminary study. Rey R; Nimmo S; Childs GS; Behar-Horenstein LS J Dent Educ; 2015 Mar; 79(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 25729027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in clinical grading associated with instructor status. Park RD; Susarla SM; Howell TH; Karimbux NY Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Feb; 13(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19196291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]