194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9457200)
1. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model.
Bae KT
Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 12702823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hepatic CT enhancement: effect of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model.
Garcia P; Genin G; Bret PM; Bonaldi VM; Reinhold C; Atri M
Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 10525816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
Bae KT; Tran HQ; Heiken JP
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):872-80. PubMed ID: 10966725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model.
Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 9609887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
Garcia PA; Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Liang L; Reinhold C; Atri M
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uniform vascular contrast enhancement and reduced contrast medium volume achieved by using exponentially decelerated contrast material injection method.
Bae KT; Tran HQ; Heiken JP
Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):732-6. PubMed ID: 15163812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT.
Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Tsuda K; Tomoda K; Narumi Y; Oi H; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT].
Erdoğan C; Savci G
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model.
Han JK; Kim AY; Lee KY; Seo JB; Kim TK; Choi BI; Lhee CS; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 10864075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Forman HP; DiCroce J
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EFFECTS OF TWO CONTRAST INJECTION PROTOCOLS ON FELINE AORTIC AND HEPATIC ENHANCEMENT USING DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Makara M; Chau J; Hall E; Kloeppel H; Podadera J; Barrs V
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 25640846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between one-route and two-route injection for liver and aortic enhancement using MDCT.
Okada M; Murakami T; Kumano S; Imaoka I; Shimono T; Ashikaga R; Hosono M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W323-6. PubMed ID: 18492873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I. Prediction with a computer model.
Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):647-55. PubMed ID: 9609886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
