These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9457201)

  • 1. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
    Mussurakis S; Gibbs P; Horsman A
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 9457201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
    Kuhl CK; Schild HH; Morakkabati N
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):789-800. PubMed ID: 16118161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
    Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast.
    Cheung HS; Tse GM; Lai SY; Yeung DK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
    Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging.
    Daniel BL; Yen YF; Glover GH; Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; Sawyer-Glover AM; Black JW; Plevritis SK; Jeffrey SS; Herfkens RJ
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 9807580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. T2-weighted MR imaging in the assessment of cirrhotic liver.
    Hussain HK; Syed I; Nghiem HV; Johnson TD; Carlos RC; Weadock WJ; Francis IR
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 14739306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience.
    Kuhl CK; Jost P; Morakkabati N; Zivanovic O; Schild HH; Gieseke J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):666-76. PubMed ID: 16549623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.
    Sherif H; Mahfouz AE; Oellinger H; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Taupitz M; Felix R; Hamm B
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9314987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique.
    Boetes C; Barentsz JO; Mus RD; van der Sluis RF; van Erning LJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Ruys SH
    Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 7972823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: reader study.
    Shimauchi A; Giger ML; Bhooshan N; Lan L; Pesce LL; Lee JK; Abe H; Newstead GM
    Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):696-704. PubMed ID: 21212365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Setoguchi T; Okafuji T; Soeda H; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e126-32. PubMed ID: 19796900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
    Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
    Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--perfusion differences in malignant and benign lesions.
    Schaefer JF; Vollmar J; Schick F; Vonthein R; Seemann MD; Aebert H; Dierkesmann R; Friedel G; Claussen CD
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):544-53. PubMed ID: 15215548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Half-Fourier, three-dimensional technique for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of both breasts and axillae: initial characterization of breast lesions.
    Perman WH; Heiberg EV; Herrmann VM
    Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):263-9. PubMed ID: 8657924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging.
    Jacobs MA; Barker PB; Bluemke DA; Maranto C; Arnold C; Herskovits EH; Bhujwalla Z
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 14519877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of dynamic phase subtraction (DPS) map in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.
    Ogura A; Hayakawa K; Yoshida S; Maeda F; Saeki F; Syukutani A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 22082548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging.
    Hecht EM; Israel GM; Krinsky GA; Hahn WY; Kim DC; Belitskaya-Levy I; Lee VS
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 15215544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.