167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9457201)
1. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
Mussurakis S; Gibbs P; Horsman A
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 9457201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
Kuhl CK; Schild HH; Morakkabati N
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):789-800. PubMed ID: 16118161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast.
Cheung HS; Tse GM; Lai SY; Yeung DK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging.
Daniel BL; Yen YF; Glover GH; Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; Sawyer-Glover AM; Black JW; Plevritis SK; Jeffrey SS; Herfkens RJ
Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 9807580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. T2-weighted MR imaging in the assessment of cirrhotic liver.
Hussain HK; Syed I; Nghiem HV; Johnson TD; Carlos RC; Weadock WJ; Francis IR
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 14739306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience.
Kuhl CK; Jost P; Morakkabati N; Zivanovic O; Schild HH; Gieseke J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):666-76. PubMed ID: 16549623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.
Sherif H; Mahfouz AE; Oellinger H; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Taupitz M; Felix R; Hamm B
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9314987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique.
Boetes C; Barentsz JO; Mus RD; van der Sluis RF; van Erning LJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Ruys SH
Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 7972823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: reader study.
Shimauchi A; Giger ML; Bhooshan N; Lan L; Pesce LL; Lee JK; Abe H; Newstead GM
Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):696-704. PubMed ID: 21212365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Setoguchi T; Okafuji T; Soeda H; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e126-32. PubMed ID: 19796900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--perfusion differences in malignant and benign lesions.
Schaefer JF; Vollmar J; Schick F; Vonthein R; Seemann MD; Aebert H; Dierkesmann R; Friedel G; Claussen CD
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):544-53. PubMed ID: 15215548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Half-Fourier, three-dimensional technique for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of both breasts and axillae: initial characterization of breast lesions.
Perman WH; Heiberg EV; Herrmann VM
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):263-9. PubMed ID: 8657924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging.
Jacobs MA; Barker PB; Bluemke DA; Maranto C; Arnold C; Herskovits EH; Bhujwalla Z
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 14519877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of dynamic phase subtraction (DPS) map in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.
Ogura A; Hayakawa K; Yoshida S; Maeda F; Saeki F; Syukutani A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 22082548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging.
Hecht EM; Israel GM; Krinsky GA; Hahn WY; Kim DC; Belitskaya-Levy I; Lee VS
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 15215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
