These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9458258)

  • 1. Postmortem analysis of consecutively retrieved asymmetric porous-coated tibial components.
    Bloebaum RD; Bachus KN; Jensen JW; Hofmann AA
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):920-9. PubMed ID: 9458258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone ingrowth into porous-coated tibial components implanted with autograft bone chips. Analysis of ten consecutively retrieved implants.
    Bloebaum RD; Rubman MH; Hofmann AA
    J Arthroplasty; 1992 Dec; 7(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 1479367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Porous-coated metal-backed patellar components in total knee replacement. A postmortem retrieval analysis.
    Bloebaum RD; Bachus KN; Jensen JW; Scott DF; Hofmann AA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Apr; 80(4):518-28. PubMed ID: 9563381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bilateral tibial components of different cementless designs and materials. Microradiographic, backscattered imaging, and histologic analysis.
    Bloebaum RD; Rhodes DM; Rubman MH; Hofmann AA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jul; (268):179-87. PubMed ID: 2060206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative histologic analysis of tissue growth into porous total knee components.
    Cook SD; Barrack RL; Thomas KA; Haddad RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1989; 4 Suppl():S33-43. PubMed ID: 2584985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Osseointegration in porous coated knee arthroplasty. The influence of component coating type in sheep.
    Bellemans J
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1999 Oct; 288():1-35. PubMed ID: 10949554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the porous coating improves fixation of tibial components. A randomised RSA study in 116 patients.
    Onsten I; Nordqvist A; Carlsson AS; Besjakov J; Shott S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 May; 80(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 9619929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of porous-coating configuration on tibial osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty.
    Whiteside LA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Dec; (321):92-7. PubMed ID: 7497691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years.
    Carlsson A; Björkman A; Besjakov J; Onsten I
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 16156464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histologic retrieval analysis of a porous tantalum metal implant in an infected primary total knee arthroplasty.
    Sambaziotis C; Lovy AJ; Koller KE; Bloebaum RD; Hirsh DM; Kim SJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Aug; 27(7):1413.e5-9. PubMed ID: 22178612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
    Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone ingrowth and wear debris in well-fixed cementless porous-coated tibial components removed from patients.
    Sumner DR; Kienapfel H; Jacobs JJ; Urban RM; Turner TM; Galante JO
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Apr; 10(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 7798096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is There A Difference in Bone Ingrowth in Modular Versus Monoblock Porous Tantalum Tibial Trays?
    Hanzlik JA; Day JS; Rimnac CM; Kurtz SM;
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jun; 30(6):1073-8. PubMed ID: 25743106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of Newer Generation Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Beaded Periapatite-Coated vs Highly Porous Titanium-Coated Implants.
    Harwin SF; Patel NK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Ramkumar PN; Roche M; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2156-2160. PubMed ID: 28237217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.
    Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Ranawat Award. Histology of nine structural bone grafts used in total knee arthroplasty.
    Parks NL; Engh GA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):17-23. PubMed ID: 9418616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does using autograft bone chips achieve consistent bone ingrowth in primary TKA?
    Bloebaum RD; Koller KE; Willie BM; Hofmann AA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jul; 470(7):1869-78. PubMed ID: 22179980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extracortical bone bridging in tumor endoprostheses. Radiographic and histologic analysis.
    Tanzer M; Turcotte R; Harvey E; Bobyn JD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2365-70. PubMed ID: 14668506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of bone marrow grafting on the titanium porous-coated implant in bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
    Kim KJ; Iwase M; Kotake S; Itoh T
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Feb; 78(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 17453402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of fixation technique on displacement incompatibilities at the bone-implant interface in cementless total knee replacement in a canine model.
    Berzins A; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Natarajan R
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 8580542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.