These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9458531)

  • 1. Vascular access problems revisited: the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) experience.
    Freytes CO
    Support Care Cancer; 1998 Jan; 6(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 9458531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost analysis of the Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) Graft compared to the tunneled dialysis catheter.
    Al Shakarchi J; Inston N; Jones RG; Maclaine G; Hollinworth D
    J Vasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 63(4):1026-33. PubMed ID: 26826055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.
    Raad I; Davis S; Becker M; Hohn D; Houston D; Umphrey J; Bodey GP
    Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurse and patient satisfaction with three types of venous access devices.
    Dearborn P; De Muth JS; Requarth AB; Ward SE
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1997; 24(1 Suppl):34-40. PubMed ID: 9010863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Implantable catheter systems].
    Willnow U
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1998 Sep; 87(36):1135-9. PubMed ID: 9782741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Access for starting kidney replacement therapy: vascular and peritoneal temporal access in pre-dialysis].
    Rodríguez CR; Bardón Otero E; Vila Paz ML
    Nefrologia; 2008; 28 Suppl 3():105-12. PubMed ID: 19018747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Totally implanted device for long-term intravenous chemotherapy: experience in 123 adult patients with solid neoplasms.
    Puig-la Calle J; López Sánchez S; Piedrafita Serra E; Allende Honorato L; Artigas Raventós V; Puig la Calle J
    J Surg Oncol; 1996 Aug; 62(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 8691841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vena cava filter practices of a regional vascular surgery society.
    Friedell ML; Nelson PR; Cheatham ML
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 26(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 22664279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients.
    Ross MN; Haase GM; Poole MA; Burrington JD; Odom LF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 3400032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New options for central venous access in cancer chemotherapy. Multiple lumen catheters.
    Kaufman JL; Nissenblatt MJ
    Am Surg; 1986 Feb; 52(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 3946932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: A randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life.
    Bow EJ; Kilpatrick MG; Clinch JJ
    J Clin Oncol; 1999 Apr; 17(4):1267. PubMed ID: 10561188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polyurethane II catheter as long-indwelling intravenous catheter in patients with cancer.
    Volkow P; Vázquez C; Téllez O; Aguilar C; Barrera L; Rodrgíuez E; Vilar-Compte D; Zinser J; Calderón E; Pérez-Padilla JR; Mohar A
    Am J Infect Control; 2003 Nov; 31(7):392-6. PubMed ID: 14639434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vascular access devices: perspectives on designs, complications, and management.
    Orr ME; Ryder MA
    Nutr Clin Pract; 1993 Aug; 8(4):145-52. PubMed ID: 8289767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Satisfaction versus dissatisfaction with venous access devices in outpatient oncology: a pilot study.
    Chernecky C
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2001; 28(10):1613-6. PubMed ID: 11759308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients.
    Eastridge BJ; Lefor AT
    J Clin Oncol; 1995 Jan; 13(1):233-8. PubMed ID: 7799025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of totally implantable vascular access port with mini-invasive Seldinger technique in 12 dogs undergoing chemotherapy.
    Valentini F; Fassone F; Pozzebon A; Gavazza A; Lubas G
    Res Vet Sci; 2013 Feb; 94(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 22921371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A modified internal jugular vein access for long-term catheter placement in cancer patients.
    Pires e Albuquerque M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):937-41. PubMed ID: 17103072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nursing and midwifery practice for maintenance of vascular access device patency. A cross-sectional survey.
    Keogh S; Flynn J; Marsh N; Higgins N; Davies K; Rickard CM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1678-85. PubMed ID: 26206327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Central venous access devices in treatment of patients with malignant tumors: venous port, central venous catheter and Hickman catheter. Cost-benefit analysis based on a critical review of the literature, personal experiences with 135 port implantations and patient attitude].
    Krupski G; Fröschle GW; Weh FJ; Schlosser GA
    Chirurg; 1995 Mar; 66(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 7750390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vascular access problems.
    Pector JC
    Support Care Cancer; 1998 Jan; 6(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 9458532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.