These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9459029)

  • 1. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.
    Lim KF; Foong KW
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 9459029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
    Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
    Ludlow JB; Gubler M; Cevidanes L; Mol A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
    Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
    Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
    Akhare PJ; Dagab AM; Alle RS; Shenoyd U; Garla V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiobjective optimization framework for landmark measurement error correction in three-dimensional cephalometric tomography.
    DeCesare A; Secanell M; Lagravère MO; Carey J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20130035. PubMed ID: 23640988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
    Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
    Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG; Rocha SS; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15371317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Chien PC; Parks ET; Eraso F; Hartsfield JK; Roberts WE; Ofner S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 19474253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.