These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 945942)

  • 1. Evaluation of a multitest microtechnique for yeast identification.
    Miller RE; Lu LP
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Jul; 42(7):238-42. PubMed ID: 945942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pasteur yeasts system, a test-kit for yeasts identification. Its evaluation in comparison with three commercial methods and conventional procedures.
    Riviera L; Bellotti MG
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1988; 67(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 3242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a commercial multitest system for identification of yeasts.
    Qadri SM; Nichols CW
    Am J Med Technol; 1978 May; 44(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 354378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].
    Russolo S; Sala A; Crotti D
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Dec; 20(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of enteric identification systems.
    Borchardt KA; Gibson J
    Health Lab Sci; 1977 Jan; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 319082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auxacolor, a new commercial system for yeast identification: evaluation of 182 strains comparatively with ID 32C.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Lebeau B; Kervroedan P; Faure O; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1995; 53(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 7574109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
    Gutierrez J; Martin E; Lozano C; Coronilla J; Nogales C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 7856946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of yeast identification systems. An analysis of the College of American Pathologists Special Mycology Survey data.
    Fuchs PC; Dolan CT
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Oct; 78(4 Suppl):664-7. PubMed ID: 7137107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Identification of yeasts of the Candida genus with a growth inhibition system: Microring YT].
    Torres-Rodríguez JM; Montsant-Montané L; Madrenys-Brunet N
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1994 Nov; 12(9):439-42. PubMed ID: 7811770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Fungichrom 1: a new yeast identification system.
    Umabala P; Satheeshkumar T; Lakshmi V
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2002; 20(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 17657058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conventional and rapid methods for yeast identification.
    Lin CC; Fung DY
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 1987; 14(4):273-89. PubMed ID: 3308316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Usefulness of the CHROM-agar Candida culture medium in the differentiation and presumed identification of yeast of clinical interest].
    García-Martos P; Mira-Gutiérrez J; Galán-Sánchez F; Hernández-Molina JM
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1997 Feb; 15(2):70-2. PubMed ID: 9101749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New PCR-based methods for yeast identification.
    Hierro N; González A; Mas A; Guillamón JM
    J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(4):792-801. PubMed ID: 15357729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of simplified and commercial systems for identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deák T; Beuchat LR
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 7(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 3079471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of different methods for the identification of Candida species isolated from clinical specimens].
    Cetinkaya Z; Altindiş M; Aktepe OC; Karabiçak N
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2003 Oct; 37(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 14748264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Vitek 2 for identification of yeasts in the clinical laboratory.
    Meurman O; Koskensalo A; Rantakokko-Jalava K
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2006 Jun; 12(6):591-3. PubMed ID: 16700713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of RapID yeast plus system with API 20C system for identification of common, new, and emerging yeast pathogens.
    Espinel-Ingroff A; Stockman L; Roberts G; Pincus D; Pollack J; Marler J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Apr; 36(4):883-6. PubMed ID: 9542903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of Agar Candida ID2 (bioMerieux) a chromogenic medium for yeasts differentiation].
    Ciok-Pater E; Zalas P; Gospodarek E
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2006; 58(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 17341000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
    Kjaeldgaard P; Nissen B; Lange N; Laursen H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.