229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9461689)
1. [Impact factor--is it indeed a reliable tool for evaluation of scientific merit?].
Gadoth N
Harefuah; 1997 Sep; 133(5-6):196-8. PubMed ID: 9461689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Does the impact factor the single suitable criteria to judge the quality of a scientific paper?].
Cynober L
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2002; 60(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 12050039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Pitfalls and skewing on impact factor calculations--may we use them for evaluation of scientific quality?].
Gadoth N
Harefuah; 1999 May; 136(9):690-1. PubMed ID: 10955090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Once more on the impact factor ...].
Gattinoni L
Ann Ital Med Int; 1999; 14(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 10566192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Once more on the impact factor ...].
Federspil G; Scandellari C
Ann Ital Med Int; 1999; 14(3):216-7. PubMed ID: 10566191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Once more on the impact factor ...].
Vecchio C
Ann Ital Med Int; 1999; 14(3):214-6. PubMed ID: 10566190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The use and abuse of impact factors.
Marks SC
Clin Anat; 2003 May; 16(3):282-3. PubMed ID: 12673827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Proposed scoring system for biomedical scientific publications].
Figueredo E
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2007 Feb; 54(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 17390692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Science journals artfully try to boost their rankings.
Begley S
Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Jun; ():B1, B8. PubMed ID: 16838450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of scientific publications and professional life of a scientist].
Reverter Masià J
Nutr Hosp; 2012; 27(4):1368-9. PubMed ID: 23165589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production].
Gensini GF; Conti AA
Ann Ital Med Int; 1999; 14(2):130-3; discussion 134-5. PubMed ID: 10399377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific publishing. Data integrity report sends journals back to the drawing board.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5939):381. PubMed ID: 19628832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [One more time on impact factor!].
Thulesius H
Lakartidningen; 2001 Jun; 98(24):2957. PubMed ID: 11449905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact factors in scientific journals.
Hemmingsson A; Edgren J; Mygind T; Skjennald A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 May; 15(5):619. PubMed ID: 11997905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact factor as measure of scientific quality.
Semenzato G; Rizzato G; Agostini C
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2004 May; 169(9):1070; author reply 1070-1. PubMed ID: 15107304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.
Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18661263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Authors, editors, policy makers, and the impact factor.
Huth EJ
Croat Med J; 2001 Feb; 42(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 11172650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals].
Bouter LM; Knottnerus JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1178-83. PubMed ID: 10876699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention, impact and the economy of science.
Korkeila J
Nord J Psychiatry; 2007; 61(5):321-2. PubMed ID: 17990191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Journal impact factors and self-citations: implications for psychology journals.
Anseel F; Duyck W; De Baene W; Brysbaert M
Am Psychol; 2004 Jan; 59(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 14736325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
