These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9461907)

  • 1. Marginal seal composition in amalgam restored teeth of varying marginal leakage.
    Grossman ES; Witcomb MJ; Matejka JM
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1997 Mar; 52(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 9461907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of amalgams, bases, and varnish on seal composition at restoration tooth interfaces.
    Grossman ES; Witcomb MJ; Matejka JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Mar; 73(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 7760280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of extraction replicas in scanning electron microscopy for the elemental analysis of marginal seals.
    Witcomb MJ; Jodaikin A; Grossman ES
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Aug; 21(8):955-64. PubMed ID: 3654688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of base/liner use on restoration leakage.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Marshall KR; Holman BG
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 16689065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of three cavity varnishes in reducing marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Ulukapi I; Lussi A; Stich H; Hotz P
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1992 Sep; 1(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 1308785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations pretreated with various liners.
    Tjan AH; Tan DE; Sun JC; Tjan AH
    Am J Dent; 1997 Dec; 10(6):284-6. PubMed ID: 9590917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Microleakage of four different amalgam binding systems].
    Oberholzer TG; Grobler SR; Rossouw RJ; van Wyk Kotze TJ; Grobler-Rabie A
    SADJ; 2001 Feb; 56(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 16894691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Liu JK; Chang CH; Shieh DB
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15195731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experimental use of dentin bonding agents and a cavity varnish to reduce marginal microleakage in high copper amalgam restorations].
    Aras S; Cetiner S
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 May; 16(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 2700122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Liu JK; Chao CC; Liao FP; Chen YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11208208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elements in marginal seals at amalgam-tooth interfaces.
    Grossman ES; Witcomb MJ; Jodaikin A
    J Dent Res; 1986 Jul; 65(7):998-1000. PubMed ID: 3458763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.