79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9461953)
1. [The effect of bonded and nonbonded posts on the fracture resistance of dentin].
Driessen CH; Marais JT; de Villiers DP; Nel JC
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1997 Jun; 52(6):393-8. PubMed ID: 9461953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An ex vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with composite core and different post and core systems.
Al-Omiri MK; Al-Wahadni AM
Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):890-9. PubMed ID: 17014528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system.
D'Arcangelo C; Cinelli M; De Angelis F; D'Amario M
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 17854620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems.
Piemjai M; Arksornnukit M
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 17672830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evaluation of displacement resistance of glass FRC posts to root dentine using a thin slice push-out test.
Toman M; Toksavul S; Sarikanat M; Firidinoğlu K; Akin A
Int Endod J; 2009 Sep; 42(9):802-10. PubMed ID: 19548933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of bonded gold inlays on fracture resistance of teeth.
Eakle WS; Staninec M
Quintessence Int; 1992 Jun; 23(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 1502322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin.
Bell AM; Lassila LV; Kangasniemi I; Vallittu PK
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):533-9. PubMed ID: 16005792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives.
Kivanç BH; Görgül G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):33-40. PubMed ID: 18997914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of dentin conditioning on retention of airborne-particle-abraded, adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced resin posts.
Albashaireh ZS; Ghazal M; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 18992570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention strength of tin plated gold inlays bonded with two resin cements.
Eakle WS; Giblin JM
Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 11199614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of remaining dentine structure and thermal-mechanical aging on the fracture resistance of bovine roots with different post and core systems.
Marchi GM; Mitsui FH; Cavalcanti AN
Int Endod J; 2008 Nov; 41(11):969-76. PubMed ID: 19133086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro bonding of adhesive resin to dental alloys and dentine.
van der Vyver PJ; de Wet FA
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Jul; 51(7):419-25. PubMed ID: 9462023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fatigue resistance of bovine teeth restored with resin-bonded fiber posts: effect of post surface conditioning.
Zamboni SC; Baldissara P; Pelogia F; Bottino MA; Scotti R; Valandro LF
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 18254561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro.
Hedlund SO; Johansson NG; Sjögren G
Br Dent J; 2003 Aug; 195(3):155-8; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 12907984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
Balbosh A; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
