These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9461994)

  • 1. Multi-planar and cross-sectional oblique scanning (CT) in implant surgery.
    Lownie JF; Lownie MA; Payne AG; Skinstad TN
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1997 Apr; 52(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 9461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Work in progress.
    Rothman SL; Chaftez N; Rhodes ML; Schwarz MS
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 3380955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
    Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
    Gher ME; Richardson AC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
    Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional CT scan analysis for implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Gogarnoiu D; Cavanaugh RR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Sep; 20(9):855-60, 862, 864 passim; quiz 868. PubMed ID: 10649955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and mandible with immediately loaded implants: preliminary data from a retrospective study, considering time of implantation.
    Strietzel FP; Karmon B; Lorean A; Fischer PP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 21365049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible.
    Nissan J; Ghelfan O; Mardinger O; Calderon S; Chaushu G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 19673921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic findings in the maxillary sinus: comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography.
    Maestre-Ferrín L; Galán-Gil S; Carrillo-García C; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 21483887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multidimensional osteodistraction for correction of implant malposition in edentulous segments.
    Zechner W; Bernhart T; Zauza K; Celar A; Watzek G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):531-8. PubMed ID: 11564115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modified surgical protocol for placing implants in the maxillary tuberosity: clinical results at 36 months after loading with fixed partial dentures.
    Venturelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):743-9. PubMed ID: 8990635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
    Hanssens JF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Localised maxillary ridge expansion with simultaneous implant placement: a case series.
    Demarosi F; Leghissa GC; Sardella A; Lodi G; Carrassi A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 47(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 19150155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Definitive CAD/CAM-guided prosthesis for immediate loading of bone-grafted maxilla: a case report.
    Kupeyan HK; Shaffner M; Armstrong J
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 16919024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [X-ray study of patients at the stage of preparation for prosthesis by using dental maxillary implants].
    Adonina OV; Golubeva GI; Perfil'ev SA; Rabukhina NA; Kulakov AA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2003; (1):23-5. PubMed ID: 12776502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.