348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9462324)
1. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies.
Egger M; Schneider M; Davey Smith G
BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7125):140-4. PubMed ID: 9462324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Pereira C; Castilho E
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis.
Liu T; Nie X; Wu Z; Zhang Y; Feng G; Cai S; Lv Y; Peng X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29284414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials.
Peto R; Collins R; Gray R
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 7853045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reconciliation of conflicting evidence.
Gallagher EJ
Ann Emerg Med; 1999 May; 33(5):561-4. PubMed ID: 10216333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities.
Cameron C; Fireman B; Hutton B; Clifford T; Coyle D; Wells G; Dormuth CR; Platt R; Toh S
Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():147. PubMed ID: 26537988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Limitations of meta-analysis from published data in epidemiological research].
Blettner M; Schlehofer B; Sauerbrei W
Soz Praventivmed; 1997; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 9221627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
Pinto A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: reasons and implications for meta-analyses.
Peters J; Mengersen K
Eval Health Prof; 2008 Dec; 31(4):370-89. PubMed ID: 19000980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis in cancer epidemiology.
Morris RD
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Nov; 102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):61-6. PubMed ID: 7851334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commentary. Oligognostic mega-analysis. Is Archie turning in his grave?
Shapiro S
Maturitas; 2015 Aug; 81(4):439-41. PubMed ID: 26117244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias'.
Kaizar EE; Vydra TP
Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):538-9. PubMed ID: 24395075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Danger of misuse of meta-analyses for observational studies based on published data.
Sauerbrei W; Blettner M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():33. PubMed ID: 11187567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Observational studies and randomized trials.
Kunz R; Khan KS; Neumayer HH
N Engl J Med; 2000 Oct; 343(16):1194-5; author reply 1196-7. PubMed ID: 11041757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias' by Taylor R. Pressler and Eloise E. Kaizar, Statistics in Medicine 2013.
Schmidt AF; Hoes AW; Groenwold RH
Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):536-7. PubMed ID: 24395074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
