89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9462395)
21. Completeness and accuracy of registration of colorectal cancer in Finland.
Kyllönen LE; Teppo L; Lehtonen M
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1987; 76(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 3434988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Should total number of lymph nodes be used as a quality of care measure for stage III colon cancer?
Wang J; Kulaylat M; Rockette H; Hassett J; Rajput A; Dunn KB; Dayton M
Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 19300237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Childhood cancer survival in Europe and the United States.
Gatta G; Capocaccia R; Coleman MP; Ries LA; Berrino F
Cancer; 2002 Oct; 95(8):1767-72. PubMed ID: 12365026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Morbidity, functional status, and immunosuppressive therapy after heart transplantation: an analysis of the joint International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry.
Brann WM; Bennett LE; Keck BM; Hosenpud JD
J Heart Lung Transplant; 1998 Apr; 17(4):374-82. PubMed ID: 9588582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Malignant melanoma of the skin as evidenced by epidemiological cancer registries in Germany -- incidence, clinical parameters, variations in recording].
Lehnert M; Eberle A; Hentschel S; Katalinic A; Kieschke J; Schmidtmann I; Schubert-Fritschle G; Stegmaier C; Hense HW
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Oct; 67(10):729-35. PubMed ID: 16235142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cancer survival analysis in Hamburg 1995-2003: assessing the data quality within a population-based registry.
Nennecke AL; Hentschel S; Reintjes R
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18607873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Trends in survival after childhood cancer in Europe, 1978-1997: report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project (ACCIS).
Magnani C; Pastore G; Coebergh JW; Viscomi S; Spix C; Steliarova-Foucher E
Eur J Cancer; 2006 Sep; 42(13):1981-2005. PubMed ID: 16919766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An audit of colon cancer data on the New Zealand Cancer Registry.
Cunningham R; Sarfati D; Hill S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2008 Aug; 121(1279):46-56. PubMed ID: 18709047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of New Zealand Cancer Registry data with an independent lung cancer audit.
Stevens W; Stevens G; Kolbe J; Cox B
N Z Med J; 2008 Jun; 121(1276):29-41. PubMed ID: 18574507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Association of diabetes with survival among cohorts of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians with cancer.
Martin JH; Coory MD; Valery PC; Green AC
Cancer Causes Control; 2009 Apr; 20(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 18953694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Testing equality of relative survival patterns based on aggregated data.
Hakulinen T; Tenkanen L; Abeywickrama K; Päivärinta L
Biometrics; 1987 Jun; 43(2):313-25. PubMed ID: 3607203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study.
Dregan A; Moller H; Murray-Thomas T; Gulliford MC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 22727737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improving the comparability of cancer registry treatment data and proposals for a new national minimum dataset.
Pheby DF; Etherington DJ
J Public Health Med; 1994 Sep; 16(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 7999387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Are differences in stage at presentation a credible explanation for reported differences in the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in Europe?
Woodman CB; Gibbs A; Scott N; Haboubi NY; Collins S
Br J Cancer; 2001 Sep; 85(6):787-90. PubMed ID: 11556824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Importance of district of residence and known primary site for bowel cancer survival: analysis of data from Wessex Cancer Registry.
Pickering RM; Chadwell IR; Mountney L
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Jun; 46(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 1645084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cancer registration: principles and methods. Analysis of survival.
Parkin DM; Hakulinen T
IARC Sci Publ; 1991; (95):159-76. PubMed ID: 1894319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. National and international variation in the registration of bladder cancer.
Crow P; Ritchie AW
BJU Int; 2003 Oct; 92(6):563-6. PubMed ID: 14511034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of variation in cancer registration practice on observed international cancer survival differences between International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) jurisdictions.
Eden M; Harrison S; Griffin M; Lambe M; Pettersson D; Gavin A; Brewster DH; Lin Y; Johannesen TB; Milne RL; Farrugia H; Nishri D; King MJ; Huws DW; Warlow J; Turner D; Earle CC; Peake M; Rashbass J
Cancer Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 58():184-192. PubMed ID: 30639877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Health care system, cancer registration and follow-up of cancer patients in Denmark.
Storm HH
IARC Sci Publ; 1995; (132):48-50. PubMed ID: 7797296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Choosing the net survival method for cancer survival estimation.
Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Pokhrel A
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1123-9. PubMed ID: 24183462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
