These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9462909)

  • 1. The influence of foot abduction on differences between two-dimensional and three-dimensional rearfoot motion.
    McClay I; Manal K
    Foot Ankle Int; 1998 Jan; 19(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 9462909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of changing foot progression angle using real-time visual feedback on rearfoot eversion during running.
    Mousavi SH; van Kouwenhove L; Rajabi R; Zwerver J; Hijmans JM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246425. PubMed ID: 33566828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between rearfoot, tibia and femur kinematics in runners with and without patellofemoral pain.
    Luz BC; Dos Santos AF; de Souza MC; de Oliveira Sato T; Nawoczenski DA; Serrão FV
    Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():416-422. PubMed ID: 29475152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of changing mediolateral center of pressure on rearfoot eversion during treadmill running.
    Mousavi SH; van Kouwenhove L; Rajabi R; Zwerver J; Hijmans JM
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():201-209. PubMed ID: 33171373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics during running between excessive pronators and normals.
    McClay I; Manal K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1998 Apr; 13(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 11415788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of center-of-pressure data to indicate rearfoot inversion-eversion in shod running.
    Dixon SJ
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2006; 96(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 16868323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fore- and rearfoot kinematics in high- and low-arched individuals during running.
    Barnes A; Wheat J; Milner CE
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Jul; 32(7):710-6. PubMed ID: 21972767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical Factors Associated With Achilles Tendinopathy and Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Runners.
    Becker J; James S; Wayner R; Osternig L; Chou LS
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Sep; 45(11):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 28581815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical measures of hip and foot-ankle mechanics as predictors of rearfoot motion and posture.
    Souza TR; Mancini MC; Araújo VL; Carvalhais VO; Ocarino JM; Silva PL; Fonseca ST
    Man Ther; 2014 Oct; 19(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 24268425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of foot orthotics on three-dimensional kinematics of the leg and rearfoot during running.
    Nawoczenski DA; Cook TM; Saltzman CL
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1995 Jun; 21(6):317-27. PubMed ID: 7655475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Foot placement angle and arch type: effect on rearfoot motion.
    Kernozek TW; Ricard MD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Nov; 71(12):988-91. PubMed ID: 2241547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of inverted orthoses on lower-extremity mechanics in runners.
    Williams DS; McClay Davis I; Baitch SP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2060-8. PubMed ID: 14652503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-function foot orthosis: effect on shock and control of rearfoot motion.
    Butler RJ; Davis IM; Laughton CM; Hughes M
    Foot Ankle Int; 2003 May; 24(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 12801197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance training is accompanied by increases in hip strength and changes in lower extremity biomechanics during running.
    Snyder KR; Earl JE; O'Connor KM; Ebersole KT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jan; 24(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 19013697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forefoot angle at initial contact determines the amplitude of forefoot and rearfoot eversion during running.
    Monaghan GM; Hsu WH; Lewis CL; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Sep; 29(8):936-42. PubMed ID: 25001326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running.
    Sakaguchi M; Ogawa H; Shimizu N; Kanehisa H; Yanai T; Kawakami Y
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14 Suppl 1():S302-9. PubMed ID: 24444222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between positive clinical outcomes of foot orthotic treatment and changes in rearfoot kinematics.
    Zammit GV; Payne CB
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2007; 97(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 17507529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in foot muscle morphology and foot kinematics between symptomatic and asymptomatic pronated feet.
    Zhang X; Pauel R; Deschamps K; Jonkers I; Vanwanseele B
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Nov; 29(11):1766-1773. PubMed ID: 31278774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls.
    Tome J; Nawoczenski DA; Flemister A; Houck J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2006 Sep; 36(9):635-44. PubMed ID: 17017268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of foot orthoses on magnitude and timing of rearfoot and tibial motions, ground reaction force and knee moment during running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Hinse S; Sadeghi H; Popov P; Allard P
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Nov; 12(6):679-84. PubMed ID: 18768360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.