These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9463544)
1. A quantitative structure-toxicity relationships model for the dermal sensitization guinea pig maximization assay. Enslein K; Gombar VK; Blake BW; Maibach HI; Hostynek JJ; Sigman CC; Bagheri D Food Chem Toxicol; 1997; 35(10-11):1091-8. PubMed ID: 9463544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of sex differences in guinea-pig maximization test for detection of skin-sensitizing potential using OECD recommended positive control sensitizers. Nakamura Y; Higaki T; Kato H; Kishida F; Nakatsuka I J Toxicol Sci; 1998 May; 23(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 9644650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database. Cronin MT; Basketter DA SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(3):159-79. PubMed ID: 8790644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An alternative strategy to the use of guinea pigs for the identification of skin sensitization hazard. Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Chamberlain M; Barratt MD Food Chem Toxicol; 1995 Dec; 33(12):1051-6. PubMed ID: 8847001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemical applicability domain of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation potency. Part 3. Apparent discrepancies between LLNA and GPMT sensitisation potential: False positives or differences in sensitivity? Roberts DW; Schultz TW; Api AM Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():260-7. PubMed ID: 27477089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin sensitization potency of isoeugenol and its dimers evaluated by a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay and guinea pig maximization test. Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Suzuki K; Yamazaki S J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 17929237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dose-responses of contact allergens using the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay. van Och FM; Vandebriel RJ; Prinsen MK; De Jong WH; Slob W; van Loveren H Toxicology; 2001 Oct; 167(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 11578800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment. Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preclinical skin sensitization testing of antihistamines: guinea pig and local lymph node assay responses. Robinson MK; Cruze CA Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 May; 34(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 8655100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition. Enoch SJ; Cronin MT; Schultz TW; Madden JC Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 18189367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of skin sensitization: a quantitative prediction. Golla S; Madihally S; Robinson RL; Gasem KA Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Apr; 23(3):454-65. PubMed ID: 19162165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay. Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What determines skin sensitization potency: Myths, maybes and realities. The 500 molecular weight cut-off: An updated analysis. Fitzpatrick JM; Roberts DW; Patlewicz G J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):105-116. PubMed ID: 27283458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A data-based exploration of the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization points to the necessary requirements for its prediction with alternative methods. Benigni R; Bossa C; Tcheremenskaia O Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jul; 78():45-52. PubMed ID: 27090483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guinea pig maximization test for trichloroethylene and its metabolites. Tang XJ; Li LY; Huang JX; Deng YY Biomed Environ Sci; 2002 Jun; 15(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 12244752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an experimental comparison of three methods. Modjtahedi BS; Fortenbach CR; Marsano JG; Gandhi AM; Staab R; Maibach HI Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 30(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 21265706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of unsaturated compounds as assessed by the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT). Kreiling R; Hollnagel HM; Hareng L; Eigler D; Lee MS; Griem P; Dreessen B; Kleber M; Albrecht A; Garcia C; Wendel A Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):1896-904. PubMed ID: 18343554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part II: QSAR models of skin permeability and the relationships between skin permeability and skin sensitization. Alves VM; Muratov E; Fourches D; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Andrade CH; Tropsha A Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 284(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 25560673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A quantitative in silico model for predicting skin sensitization using a nearest neighbours approach within expert-derived structure-activity alert spaces. Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Hemingway R; Macmillan DS; Myden A; Plante JP; Tennant RE; Vessey JD; Steger-Hartmann T; Gould J; Hillegass J; Etter S; Smith BPC; White A; Sterchele P; De Smedt A; O'Brien D; Parakhia R J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 37(8):985-995. PubMed ID: 28244128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Guinea pig maximization test assessment of hydrocortisone and tixocortol pivalate. Mirshahpanah P; Maibach HI Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 18058310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]