BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9463852)

  • 1. Modifying the design of ongoing trials without unblinding.
    Gould AL; Shih WJ
    Stat Med; 1998 Jan; 17(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 9463852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size adjustment based on promising interim results and its application in confirmatory clinical trials.
    Chen YH; Li C; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2015 Dec; 12(6):584-95. PubMed ID: 26195615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing and changing the analysis scale in non-inferiority trials with a binary outcome.
    Li Z; Quartagno M; Böhringer S; van Geloven N
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 34693789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal adaptive group sequential design with flexible timing of sample size determination.
    Cui L; Zhang L; Yang B
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 63():8-12. PubMed ID: 28455234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
    Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum type 1 error rate inflation in multiarmed clinical trials with adaptive interim sample size modifications.
    Graf AC; Bauer P; Glimm E; Koenig F
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):614-30. PubMed ID: 24753160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising.
    Chen YH; DeMets DL; Lan KK
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1023-38. PubMed ID: 15057876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of adaptive sample size adjustment with respect to stopping criteria and time of interim analysis.
    Jahn-Eimermacher A; Hommel G
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1450-61. PubMed ID: 16900553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the efficiency of adaptive sample size design.
    Cui L; Zhang L
    Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(6):933-944. PubMed ID: 30450621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing trial design in pharmacogenetics research: comparing a fixed parallel group, group sequential, and adaptive selection design on sample size requirements.
    Boessen R; van der Baan F; Groenwold R; Egberts A; Klungel O; Grobbee D; Knol M; Roes K
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(6):366-74. PubMed ID: 24214896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flexible two-stage design with sample size reassessment for survival trials.
    Desseaux K; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5002-13. PubMed ID: 17577242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of methods for adaptive sample size adjustment.
    Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(24):3861-73. PubMed ID: 11782039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative trial design in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis saves time and patients.
    Groeneveld GJ; Graf M; van der Tweel I; van den Berg LH; Ludolph AC
    Amyotroph Lateral Scler; 2007 Oct; 8(5):266-9. PubMed ID: 17852016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive Designs with Discrete Test Statistics and Consideration of Overrunning.
    Schmidt R; Burkhardt B; Faldum A
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 26429500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size adjustment designs with time-to-event outcomes: A caution.
    Freidlin B; Korn EL
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 28795844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for variation in the required sample size in the design of group-sequential trials.
    Grayling MJ; Mander AP
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106459. PubMed ID: 34082076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expected Value of Sample Information to Guide the Design of Group Sequential Clinical Trials.
    Flight L; Julious S; Brennan A; Todd S
    Med Decis Making; 2022 May; 42(4):461-473. PubMed ID: 34859693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Issues in designing flexible trials.
    Posch M; Bauer P; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):953-69. PubMed ID: 12627412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient adaptive designs with mid-course sample size adjustment in clinical trials.
    Bartroff J; Lai TL
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1593-611. PubMed ID: 18275090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
    Morgan CC
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.