BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9464557)

  • 1. RUG-III and resource allocation: comparing the relationship of direct care time with patient characteristics in five countries.
    Carpenter GI; Ikegami N; Ljunggren G; Carrillo E; Fries BE
    Age Ageing; 1997 Sep; 26 Suppl 2():61-5. PubMed ID: 9464557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities.
    Björkgren MA; Häkkinen U; Finne-Soveri UH; Fries BE
    Scand J Public Health; 1999 Sep; 27(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 10482083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The RUG-III case mix classification system for long-term care nursing facilities: is it adequate for nurse staffing?
    Mueller C
    J Nurs Adm; 2000 Nov; 30(11):535-43. PubMed ID: 11098253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) system as a staffing tool in nursing homes.
    Dellefield ME
    Geriatr Nurs; 2006; 27(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16757387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III).
    Fries BE; Schneider DP; Foley WJ; Gavazzi M; Burke R; Cornelius E
    Med Care; 1994 Jul; 32(7):668-85. PubMed ID: 8028403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of registered nursing care of residents in English nursing homes using the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument (MDS/RAI) and Resource Utilisation Groups version III (RUG-III).
    Carpenter I; Perry M; Challis D; Hope K
    Age Ageing; 2003 May; 32(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12720613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applying RUG-III in Japanese long-term care facilities.
    Ikegami N; Fries BE; Takagi Y; Ikeda S; Ibe T
    Gerontologist; 1994 Oct; 34(5):628-39. PubMed ID: 7959131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Case-mix classification in post-acute and long-term care. Validation of Resource Utilization Groups III (RUG-III) in the Czech Republic].
    Topinková E; Neuwirth J; Mellanová A; Stanková M; Haas T
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2000 Feb; 139(2):42-8. PubMed ID: 10802930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification of residents in nursing homes in Tuscany (Italy) using Resource Utilization Groups Version III (RUG-III).
    Francesconi P; Cantini E; Bavazzano E; Lauretani F; Bandinelli S; Buiatti E; Ferrucci L
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2006 Apr; 18(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 16702782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mental dysfunction and resource use in nursing homes.
    Fries BE; Mehr DR; Schneider D; Foley WJ; Burke R
    Med Care; 1993 Oct; 31(10):898-920. PubMed ID: 8412392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the RUG-III classification system for understanding the resource intensity of persons with intellectual disability residing in nursing homes.
    Martin L; Fries BE; Hirdes JP; James M
    J Intellect Disabil; 2011 Jun; 15(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 21750215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nursing home case-mix instruments: validation of the RUG-III system in Italy.
    Brizioli E; Bernabei R; Grechi F; Masera F; Landi F; Bandinelli S; Cavazzini C; Gangemi S; Ferrucci L
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2003 Jun; 15(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14582687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Hong Kong nursing homes.
    Chou KL; Chi I; Leung JC
    Can J Aging; 2008; 27(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 19158040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [On the feasibility of a RUG-III based payment system for long-term care facilities in Korea].
    Kim EK; Park HY; Kim CY
    Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2004 Apr; 34(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 15314323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Casemix for the elderly inpatient: Resource Utilization Groups (RUGs) validation project. Casemix for the Elderly Inpatient Working Group.
    Carpenter GI; Main A; Turner GF
    Age Ageing; 1995 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 7762462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting nursing home length of stay and outcome with a resource-based classification system.
    Ljunggren G; Brandt L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1996; 12(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 8690564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation and use of resource utilization groups as a case-mix measure for long-term care.
    Cooney LM; Fries BE
    Med Care; 1985 Feb; 23(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 3919223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nursing home resident assessment and case-mix classification: cross-national perspectives.
    Clauser SB; Fries BE
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1992; 13(4):135-55. PubMed ID: 10122002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing case-mix systems for nursing home payment.
    Fries BE
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1990; 11(4):103-19. PubMed ID: 10113396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RUG-II (Resource Utilization Group, Version II) impacts on long-term care facilities in New York.
    Schultz BM; Ward D; Knickman JR
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1994; 16(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 10142375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.