These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9464879)

  • 1. Pork carcass composition derived from a neural network model of electromagnetic scans.
    Berg EP; Engel BA; Forrest JC
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jan; 76(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 9464879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Fisher JE
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2642-52. PubMed ID: 7883623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
    Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of lean and fat composition in swine carcasses from ham area measurements with image analysis.
    Jia J; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Chen W; Wagner JR
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jun; 85(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 20374892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the E+V video image analysis system as a predictor of pork carcass meat yield.
    McClure EK; Scanga JA; Belk KE; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 May; 81(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 12772846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting pork carcass and primal lean content from electromagnetic scans.
    Berg EP; Asfaw A; Ellersieck MR
    Meat Sci; 2002 Feb; 60(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 22063236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of an advanced automated ultrasonic scanner (AutoFom III) and a handheld optical probe (Destron PG-100) to determine lean yield in pork carcasses.
    Dorleku JB; Wormsbecher L; Christensen M; Campbell CP; Mandell IB; Bohrer BM
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36807699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Composition analysis of pork carcasses by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Mitchell AD; Scholz AM; Pursel VG; Evock-Clover CM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Aug; 76(8):2104-14. PubMed ID: 9734860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of swine carcass composition by total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC).
    Higbie AD; Bidner TD; Matthews JO; Southern LL; Page TG; Persica MA; Sanders MB; Monlezun CJ
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jan; 80(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 11831507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of variability in pork carcass composition and quality between barrows and gilts.
    Overholt MF; Arkfeld EK; Mohrhauser DA; King DA; Wheeler TL; Dilger AC; Shackelford SD; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4415-4426. PubMed ID: 27898864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of alternative techniques to determine pork carcass value.
    Akridge JT; Brorsen BW; Whipker LD; Forrest JC; Kuei CH; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 1582906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of electronic technology to assess lamb carcass composition.
    Berg EP; Neary MK; Forrest JC; Thomas DL; Kauffman RG
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Sep; 75(9):2433-44. PubMed ID: 9303462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pork carcass composition: II. Use of indicator cuts for predicting carcass composition.
    Swensen K; Ellis M; Brewer MS; Novakofski J; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2405-14. PubMed ID: 9781497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of increasing lysine on carcass composition and cutting yields of immunologically castrated male pigs.
    Boler DD; Kutzler LW; Meeuwse DM; King VL; Campion DR; McKeith FK; Killefer J
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2189-99. PubMed ID: 21383034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electromagnetic scanning to predict lamb carcass composition.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Thomas DL; Nusbaum N; Kauffman RG
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Jul; 72(7):1728-36. PubMed ID: 7928752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commercial adaptation of ultrasonography to predict pork carcass composition from live animal and carcass measurements.
    Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Henderson HH
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):631-9. PubMed ID: 1563990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Growth, development, and carcass composition in five genotypes of swine.
    Gu Y; Schinckel AP; Martin TG
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1719-29. PubMed ID: 1634396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of pork carcass composition based on cross-sectional region analysis of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans.
    Mitchell AD; Scholz AM; Pursel VG
    Meat Sci; 2003 Feb; 63(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 22062187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: I. Differences in predictions of value.
    Boland MA; Foster KA; Schinckel AP; Wagner J; Chen W; Berg EP; Forrest JC
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 7607995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactive effects of dietary fat source and slaughter weight in growing-finishing swine: III. Carcass and fatty acid compositions.
    Apple JK; Maxwell CV; Galloway DL; Hamilton CR; Yancey JW
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(4):1441-54. PubMed ID: 19066247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.