These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9464881)

  • 1. Heterosis losses resulting from incorrect matings in a three-breed rotational crossbreeding system in pigs.
    Jungst SB; Kuhlers DL; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jan; 76(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9464881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental comparison of equivalent terminal and rotational crossbreeding systems in swine: sow and litter performance.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Mar; 72(3):584-90. PubMed ID: 8181973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of specific crosses from Duroc-Landrace, Yorkshire-Landrace and Hampshire-Landrace sows managed in two types of gestation systems: pig performance.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Oct; 67(10):2595-602. PubMed ID: 2808165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An experimental comparison of equivalent terminal and rotational crossbreeding systems in swine: pig performance.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2578-84. PubMed ID: 7883614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons of specific crosses from Yorkshire-Landrace, Chester White-Landrace and Chester White-Yorkshire sows.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Moore RA
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1132-8. PubMed ID: 3397340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Duroc, Meishan, Fengjing, and Minzhu boars on productivity of mates and growth of first-cross progeny.
    Young LD
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2020-9. PubMed ID: 1644674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three-breed and backcross swine for litter productivity and postweaning performance.
    Wilson ER; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1981 Jan; 52(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 7240036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig growth and carcass traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2286-302. PubMed ID: 12350006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of specific crosses from Duroc, Hampshire and Spot backcross sows.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Mar; 60(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 4039311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities.
    Moeller SJ; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Mabry JW; Baas TJ; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 82(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 14753347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using test station and on-farm data for the genetic evaluation of Pietrain boars used on Landrace sows for growth performance.
    Dufrasne M; Rustin M; Jaspart V; Wavreile J; Gengler N
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3872-80. PubMed ID: 21803975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sow productivity comparisons for four breeds of swine: purebred and crossbred litters.
    Gaugler HR; Buchanan DS; Hintz RL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):941-7. PubMed ID: 6542563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjustment of pig or litter weights to a 21-day basis in Duroc, Landrace, and crossbred swine.
    Irvin KM; Peterson GA; Stewart ND
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Feb; 69(2):472-7. PubMed ID: 2016176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breed prenatal, breed postnatal and heterosis effects for postweaning traits in swine.
    Toelle VD; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Aug; 57(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 6619010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for lactation length and weaning-to-conception interval in genetic evaluations for litter size in swine.
    Marois D; Brisbane JR; Laforest JP
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jul; 78(7):1796-810. PubMed ID: 10907821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimates of additive genetic, maternal and specific combining abilities for some litter traits of swine.
    Jungst SB; Kuhlers DL
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1140-8. PubMed ID: 6542564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of crossbreeding on genetic improvement of growth and reproduction in pigs.
    Hale OM; Bondari K
    Growth; 1986; 50(4):526-36. PubMed ID: 3596329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic evaluation of alternative crossbreeding systems involving four breeds of swine. II. System efficiency.
    McLaren DG; Buchanan DS; Williams JE
    J Anim Sci; 1987 Oct; 65(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 3667465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.