These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9465948)

  • 1. [Oral contrast media in CT: improvement by addition of guar?].
    Conrad R; Schneider G; Wilhelm K; Speck U; Schild H
    Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 9465948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of the effects of bioadhesive substances as addition to oral contrast media: an experimental study].
    Conrad R; Schneider G; Textor J; Fimmers R; Sachse A; Schild HH
    Rofo; 1998 Jun; 168(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 9687954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol.
    Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tolerance of iotrolan 190 and cerebrospinal fluid-diluted iotrolan 300 at the same iodine concentration in lumbar myelography.
    Wenzel-Hora BI; Potthoff PC; Jänicke UA
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():148-52. PubMed ID: 2568783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications.
    Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemorrheologic effects of iotrolan after intra-arterial injection in rabbits: comparison with other types of contrast media.
    Nauert C; Langer M; Mützel W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():40-5. PubMed ID: 2568806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison in myelography between iodixanol 270 and 320 mgI/ml and iotrolan 300 mgI/ml: a multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, phase III trial.
    Palmers Y; Kuhn FP; Petersen D; De Greef D
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):686-91. PubMed ID: 11870488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance.
    Liedenbaum MH; Denters MJ; Zijta FM; van Ravesteijn VF; Bipat S; Vos FM; Dekker E; Stoker J
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Jan; 66(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 21147296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective comparison of iotrolan and iohexol in lumbar myelography.
    Wagner A; Jensen C; Saebye A; Rasmussen TB
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Mar; 35(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 8172748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between iotrolan, a non-ionic dimer, and a hyperosmolar contrast medium, Urografin, in hysterosalpingography.
    Brokensha C; Whitehouse G
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jul; 64(763):587-90. PubMed ID: 1873659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical trials with iotrolan in myelographic and computed tomography applications in the United States.
    Goldstein HA; Pfennig D
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():167-70. PubMed ID: 2568788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arthrography with iotrolan: double-blind comparison between nonionic, monomeric (iohexol 300) and nonionic, dimeric (iotrolan 300) contrast media.
    Schmidt M; Papassotiriou V
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():182-9. PubMed ID: 2568791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Non-ionic iodinated dimeric versus monomeric X-ray contrast media: effects on complement factors in vivo].
    Böhm I; Speck U; Schild H
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 16508838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gastrointestinal diagnosis with iotrolan: experience in pediatric radiology.
    Tröger J; Wenzel-Hora BI
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():195-9. PubMed ID: 2568793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Iotrolan versus iopamidol. A controlled double-blind study with lumbar myelography].
    Maier B; Gerber U; König M; Stetter G
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):393-6. PubMed ID: 1410326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Iotrolan versus iopamidol: a controlled, multicenter, double-blind study of lumbar and direct cervical myelography.
    Ringel K; Klotz E; Wenzel-Hora BI
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():153-7. PubMed ID: 2568784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast agent-induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: lohexol compared with meglumine iothalamate.
    Thomas ML; Bowles JN; Piaggio RB; Price J; Treweeke PS
    Vasa; 1985; 14(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 3883671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knee arthrography: comparison of iotrolan and ioxaglate sodium meglumine.
    Obermann WR; Bloem JL; Hermans J
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 2781008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast agent-induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: meglumine loxaglate versus meglumine lothalamate.
    Thomas ML; Briggs GM; Kuan BB
    Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):399-400. PubMed ID: 6340158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.