149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9466046)
1. Factors affecting participation in a mammography screening program among members of an urban Detroit health maintenance organization.
Simon MS; Gimotty PA; Coombs J; McBride S; Moncrease A; Burack RC
Cancer Detect Prev; 1998; 22(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9466046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Promoting screening mammography in inner-city settings: a randomized controlled trial of computerized reminders as a component of a program to facilitate mammography.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; Stengle W; Warbasse L; Moncrease A
Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):609-24. PubMed ID: 8189778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of patient reminders on the use of screening mammography in an urban health department primary care setting.
Simon MS; Gimotty PA; Moncrease A; Dews P; Burack RC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2001 Jan; 65(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 11245341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of adding Pap smear information to a mammography reminder system in an HMO: results of randomized controlled trial.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA; Simon M; Moncrease A; Dews P
Prev Med; 2003 May; 36(5):547-54. PubMed ID: 12689799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization.
Somkin CP; Hiatt RA; Hurley LB; Gruskin E; Ackerson L; Larson P
Arch Intern Med; 1997 Aug 11-25; 157(15):1658-64. PubMed ID: 9250226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Promoting screening mammography in inner-city settings. The sustained effectiveness of computerized reminders in a randomized controlled trial.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA
Med Care; 1997 Sep; 35(9):921-31. PubMed ID: 9298081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of patient and physician reminders on use of screening mammography in a health maintenance organization. Results of a randomized controlled trial.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; Simon MS; Dews P; Moncrease A
Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(8):1708-21. PubMed ID: 8859184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening.
Feldstein AC; Perrin N; Rosales AG; Schneider J; Rix MM; Keels K; Schoap S; Glasgow RE
Am J Prev Med; 2009 Aug; 37(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 19589447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using physician correspondence and postcard reminders to promote mammography use.
Taplin SH; Anderman C; Grothaus L; Curry S; Montano D
Am J Public Health; 1994 Apr; 84(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 8154558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.
Luckmann R; White MJ; Costanza ME; Frisard CF; Cranos C; Sama S; Yood R
Transl Behav Med; 2017 Sep; 7(3):547-556. PubMed ID: 28452044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patterns of use of mammography among inner-city Detroit women: contrasts between a health department, HMO, and private hospital.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA; Stengle W; Warbasse L; Moncrease A
Med Care; 1993 Apr; 31(4):322-34. PubMed ID: 8464249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does telephone contact with a physician's office staff improve mammogram screening rates?
Bodiya A; Vorias D; Dickson HA
Fam Med; 1999 May; 31(5):324-6. PubMed ID: 10407709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study.
Taplin SH; Barlow WE; Ludman E; MacLehos R; Meyer DM; Seger D; Herta D; Chin C; Curry S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Feb; 92(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 10655440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Zollinger TW; Maraj M; Skinner CS; Zoppi KA; Muegge CM
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 12549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography interventions for 65- to 74-year-old HMO women. Program effectiveness and predictors of use.
King ES; Ross E; Seay J; Balshem A; Rimer B
J Aging Health; 1995 Nov; 7(4):529-51. PubMed ID: 10165968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the physician as an information source on mammography.
Metsch LR; McCoy CB; McCoy HV; Pereyra M; Trapido E; Miles C
Cancer Pract; 1998; 6(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 9767336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of primary care office systems as predictors of mammography utilization.
Gann P; Melville SK; Luckmann R
Ann Intern Med; 1993 Jun; 118(11):893-8. PubMed ID: 8480964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study of socio-economic characteristics, diagnosis and outcome of women participating or not participating in mammogram screening.
Padoan M; Ferrante D; Pretti G; Magnani C
Ann Ig; 2014; 26(6):518-26. PubMed ID: 25524076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography-related beliefs of older women. A survey of an HMO population.
King E; Rimer BK; Balshem A; Ross E; Seay J
J Aging Health; 1993 Feb; 5(1):82-100. PubMed ID: 10123496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
