BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9466142)

  • 21. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
    Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implicit versus explicit ranking: on inferring ordinal preferences for health care programmes based on differences in willingness-to-pay.
    Olsen JA; Donaldson C; Shackley P;
    J Health Econ; 2005 Sep; 24(5):990-6. PubMed ID: 15893827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of two methods for eliciting contingent valuations of colorectal cancer screening.
    Whynes DK; Frew E; Wolstenholme JL
    J Health Econ; 2003 Jul; 22(4):555-74. PubMed ID: 12842315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Testing the convergent validity of the contingent valuation and travel cost methods in valuing the benefits of health care.
    Clarke PM
    Health Econ; 2002 Mar; 11(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 11921310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A utility-theoretic model for QALYs and willingness to pay.
    Klose T
    Health Econ; 2003 Jan; 12(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 12483758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods.
    Ryan M; Scott DA; Donaldson C
    J Health Econ; 2004 Mar; 23(2):237-58. PubMed ID: 15019754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Willingness to pay for publicly financed health care services in Central and Eastern Europe: evidence from six countries based on a contingent valuation method.
    Tambor M; Pavlova M; Rechel B; Golinowska S; Sowada C; Groot W
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 116():193-201. PubMed ID: 25016327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The random card sort method and respondent certainty in contingent valuation: an exploratory investigation of range bias.
    Shackley P; Dixon S
    Health Econ; 2014 Oct; 23(10):1213-23. PubMed ID: 23922327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A note on the expected biases in conventional iterative health state valuation protocols.
    Ternent L; Tsuchiya A
    Med Decis Making; 2013 May; 33(4):544-6. PubMed ID: 23457024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.
    Hasman A
    Health Care Anal; 2003 Mar; 11(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 14510308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using willingness to pay to value close substitutes: carrier screening for cystic fibrosis revisited.
    Donaldson C; Shackley P; Abdalla M
    Health Econ; 1997; 6(2):145-59. PubMed ID: 9158967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers' and patients' willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care.
    van den Berg B; Bleichrodt H; Eeckhoudt L
    Health Econ; 2005 Apr; 14(4):363-76. PubMed ID: 15744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Framing the willingness-to-pay question: impact on response patterns and mean willingness to pay.
    Gyrd-Hansen D; Jensen ML; Kjaer T
    Health Econ; 2014 May; 23(5):550-63. PubMed ID: 23696155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy--results of a Swedish pilot study.
    Johannesson M; Jönsson B; Borgquist L
    J Health Econ; 1991; 10(4):461-73. PubMed ID: 10117014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost-benefit analysis?
    Johannesson M; Jönsson B
    Health Policy; 1991 Feb; 17(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 10113574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating a constant WTP for a QALY-a mission impossible?
    Sund B; Svensson M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Jul; 19(6):871-880. PubMed ID: 28932914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature.
    Diener A; O'Brien B; Gafni A
    Health Econ; 1998 Jun; 7(4):313-26. PubMed ID: 9683092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Willingness to pay for telecare programmes to support independent living: results from a contingent valuation study.
    Callan A; O'Shea E
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Jan; 124():94-102. PubMed ID: 25461866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Willingness-to-pay (WTP): the new-old kid on the economic evaluation block.
    Gafni A
    Can J Nurs Res; 2001 Jun; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11928155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Participatory health system priority setting: Evidence from a budget experiment.
    Costa-Font J; Forns JR; Sato A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 146():182-90. PubMed ID: 26517295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.