These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9466763)

  • 21. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Puolakkainen M; Hiltunen-Back E; Reunala T; Suhonen S; Lähteenmäki P; Lehtinen M; Paavonen J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1489-93. PubMed ID: 9620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pooling of urine specimens for detection of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections by PCR in a low-prevalence population: cost-saving strategy for epidemiological studies and screening programs.
    Morré SA; Meijer CJ; Munk C; Krüger-Kjaer S; Winther JF; Jørgensens HO; van Den Brule AJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 38(4):1679-80. PubMed ID: 10747169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitivity evaluation of the Gen-Probe AMP-CT assay by pooling urine samples for the screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infection.
    Gomes JP; Viegas S; Paulino A; Catry MA
    Int J STD AIDS; 2002 Aug; 13(8):540-2. PubMed ID: 12194735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.
    Mahony J; Chong S; Jang D; Luinstra K; Faught M; Dalby D; Sellors J; Chernesky M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3122-6. PubMed ID: 9774550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Urine as a diagnostic specimen for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Malaysia by ligase chain reaction.
    Gaydos CA; Ngeow YF; Lee HH; Canavaggio M; Welsh LE; Johanson J; Quinn TC
    Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(5):402-6. PubMed ID: 8885072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mailed, home-obtained urine specimens: a reliable screening approach for detecting asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Morré SA; van Valkengoed IG; de Jong A; Boeke AJ; van Eijk JT; Meijer CJ; van den Brule AJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 37(4):976-80. PubMed ID: 10074512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A novel real-time PCR to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine or genital swabs.
    Jaton K; Bille J; Greub G
    J Med Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 55(Pt 12):1667-1674. PubMed ID: 17108270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits.
    Stary A; Tomazic-Allen S; Choueiri B; Burczak J; Steyrer K; Lee H
    Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 8919734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine.
    Lee HH; Chernesky MA; Schachter J; Burczak JD; Andrews WW; Muldoon S; Leckie G; Stamm WE
    Lancet; 1995 Jan; 345(8944):213-6. PubMed ID: 7823713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of pooled urine samples and automated DNA isolation to achieve improved sensitivity and cost-effectiveness of large-scale testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.
    Rours GI; Verkooyen RP; Willemse HF; van der Zwaan EA; van Belkum A; de Groot R; Verbrugh HA; Ossewaarde JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4684-90. PubMed ID: 16145127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection by ligase chain reaction testing of urine among adolescent women with and without Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Xu K; Glanton V; Johnson SR; Beck-Sagué C; Bhullar V; Candal DH; Pettus KS; Farshy CE; Black CM
    Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Nov; 25(10):533-8. PubMed ID: 9858349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reduced sensitivity from pooled urine, pharyngeal and rectal specimens when using a molecular assay for the detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea near the point of care.
    Badman SG; Bell SFE; Dean JA; Lemoire J; Coffey L; Debattista J; Redmond AM; Williams OD; Gilks CF; Whiley DM
    Sex Health; 2020 Feb; 17(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 31945307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of polymerase chain reaction on pooled cervical swabs to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female sex workers in Singapore.
    Tan HH; Chan R
    Singapore Med J; 2005 May; 46(5):215-8. PubMed ID: 15858689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. False-negative results of a ligase chain reaction assay to detect Chlamydia trachomatis due to inhibitors in urine.
    Berg ES; Anestad G; Moi H; Størvold G; Skaug K
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Oct; 16(10):727-31. PubMed ID: 9405941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Screening for genital chlamydia infection: DNA amplification techniques should be the test of choice.
    Harindra V; Underhill G; Tobin JM
    Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Nov; 14(11):723-6. PubMed ID: 14624732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of genitourinary tract Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant women by ligase chain reaction assay.
    Andrews WW; Lee HH; Roden WJ; Mott CW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 9083312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison among performances of a ligase chain reaction-based assay and two enzyme immunoassays in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men with nongonococcal urethritis.
    Deguchi T; Yasuda M; Uno M; Tada K; Iwata H; Komeda H; Maeda S; Latila V; Saito I; Kawada Y
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1708-10. PubMed ID: 8784574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of menstrual cycle on the diagnostic performance of LCR, TMA, and PCE for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in home obtained and mailed vaginal flush and urine samples.
    Møller JK; Andersen B; Olesen F; Lignell T; Ostergaard L
    Sex Transm Infect; 1999 Aug; 75(4):228-30. PubMed ID: 10615307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction.
    Bassiri M; Hu HY; Domeika MA; Burczak J; Svensson LO; Lee HH; Mårdh PA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Apr; 33(4):898-900. PubMed ID: 7790456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical, urine and vaginal specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction in women: a comparison.
    Hjelm E; Hallén A; Domeika M
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2001; 81(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 11720178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.