These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9467031)

  • 1. [Costs and performance in roentgen diagnosis--conventional technique versus digital technique].
    Brandt GA; Homburg M; Cimanowski N; Ohmen E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Nov; 7(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 9467031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. If plain-film x-ray loses money, why go digital?
    Bell RA
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D13-5. PubMed ID: 10724729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital x-ray systems. Part 2. An overview of digital radiography concepts and an evaluation of cassetteless DX systems.
    Health Devices; 2001 Nov; 30(11):381-401. PubMed ID: 11770228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost analysis of digital vs analogue radiography.
    Dalla Palma L
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10 Suppl 3():S386-9. PubMed ID: 11001453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Technical considerations of a system of phosphor digital radiography and its cost-effectiveness in a radiology center].
    Ferrari G; Cuscianna G; Saguatti G; Musconi V; Monti D; Marcheggiano P; Romagnoli R
    Radiol Med; 1997; 93(1-2):100-8. PubMed ID: 9380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography.
    Dietrich TJ; Pfirrmann CW; Schwab A; Pankalla K; Buck FM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Jul; 42(7):959-67. PubMed ID: 23536038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the financial impacts of optical disk storage for digital radiography.
    Stockburger WT
    Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 10284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital vs conventional radiography: cost and revenue analysis.
    Dalla Palma L; Grisi G; Cuttin R; Rimondini A
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1682-92. PubMed ID: 10525891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The economic expediency of digital fluorography].
    Blinov NN; Gubenko MB; Utkin PM
    Med Tekh; 1999; (5):41-4. PubMed ID: 10560099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preparing a business justification for going electronic.
    Ortiz AO; Luyckx MP
    Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 11857990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative assessment of digital and analog radiography: diagnostic accuracy, cost analysis and quality of care.
    Colin C; Vergnon P; Guibaud L; Borson O; Pinaudeau D; Perret Du Cray MH; Pasquier JM; Tran-Minh V
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 26(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 9587746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medical and economic aspects of digital roentgenography].
    Bagaeva NG
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2002; (4):52-3. PubMed ID: 12577666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [5 years quality assurance in accordance with the roentgen regulation. Benefits, costs, necessary innovations].
    Brandt GA; Schmidt T; Marciniak H; Mechte M; Mischke W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 9172662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-benefit evaluation of body computed tomography.
    Moore AT; Dixon AK; Rubenstein D; Wheeler T
    Health Trends; 1987 Aug; 19(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 10312239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging.
    Bansal GJ
    Postgrad Med J; 2006 Jul; 82(969):425-8. PubMed ID: 16822918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Means of enhancing efficiency in operating the RUM-20 and RUM-20M X-ray diagnostic units].
    Kochetova GP
    Med Tekh; 1986; (4):36-40. PubMed ID: 3762372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calculate film costs before going electronic.
    King BF
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Sep; Suppl():P47-50. PubMed ID: 10170156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct radiography can boost radiology productivity, cut costs.
    Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Mar; 3(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 10178786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.