117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9467478)
1. Bladder autoaugmentation in the rabbit using de-epithelialized segments of small intestine, stomach and lyophilized human dura mater.
Cranidis A; Nestoridis G; Delakas D; Lumbakis P; Kanavaros P
Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 9467478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-epithelialization of demucosalized stomach patch with tissue-engineered urothelial mucosa combined with Botox A in bladder augmentation.
Zhang Y; Liu G; Kropp BP
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E106-12. PubMed ID: 22288946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty and demucosalized gastrocystoplasty in a sheep model.
Dewan PA; Stefanek W; Lorenz C; Owen AJ; Byard RW
Urology; 1995 Feb; 45(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 7855977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enteric mucosal regrowth after bladder augmentation using demucosalized gut segments.
Dewan PA; Close CE; Byard RW; Ashwood PJ; Mitchell ME
J Urol; 1997 Sep; 158(3 Pt 2):1141-6. PubMed ID: 9258158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Urodynamic evaluation of experimental bladder augmentation with seromuscular colocystoplasty].
Ardela Díaz E; Adot Zurbano JM; Plaza Martos JA; Gutiérrez Dueñas JM; Martín Pinto F; Díez Pascual R; Domínguez Vallejo FJ
Cir Pediatr; 2003 Apr; 16(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 13677100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Autoaugmentation demucosalized enterocystoplasty.
Dewan PA
World J Urol; 1998; 16(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 9775424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the effect of adhesion barriers and/or intravesical balloon inflation improve bladder autoaugmentation outcomes in a rabbit model?
Okutucu TM; Telli O; Ozturk E; Suer E; Hamidi N; Burgu B
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):86.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25869825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aerosol transfer of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells onto demucosalized colonic segments for bladder augmentation: in vivo, long term, and functional pilot study.
Hidas G; Lee HJ; Bahoric A; Kelly MS; Watts B; Liu Z; Saharti S; Lusch A; Alamsahebpour A; Kerbl D; Truong H; Zi X; Khoury AE
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Oct; 11(5):260.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26022502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty: further studies of the sheep model.
Close CE; Anderson PD; Edwards GA; Mitchell ME; Dewan PA
BJU Int; 2004 Sep; 94(4):658-62. PubMed ID: 15329131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Demucosalized augmentation gastrocystoplasty with bladder autoaugmentation in pediatric patients.
Nguyen DH; Mitchell ME; Horowitz M; Bagli DJ; Carr MC
J Urol; 1996 Jul; 156(1):206-9. PubMed ID: 8648806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of silver nitrate for chemical de-epithelialization and urothelialization of intestine in a rabbit model of augmentation cystoplasty.
Demirbilek S; Uğuralp S; Gürbüz N; Sezgin N; Kirimlioğlu H
Urol Res; 2003 Aug; 31(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 12802541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of different bladder autoaugmentation techniques in a rabbit model.
Eliçevik M; Celayir S; Dervisoglu S; Büyükünal SN
Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 9467476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty: early clinical results.
Dewan PA; Stefanek W
Br J Urol; 1994 Oct; 74(4):460-4. PubMed ID: 7820424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Grafting of cultured uroepithelium and bladder mucosa into de-epithelialized segments of colon in rabbits.
Merguerian P; Chavez DR; Hakim S
J Urol; 1994 Aug; 152(2 Pt 2):671-4. PubMed ID: 8021992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bladder autoaugmentation: partial detrusor excision to augment the bladder without use of bowel.
Cartwright PC; Snow BW
J Urol; 1989 Oct; 142(4):1050-3. PubMed ID: 2795729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bladder carcinoma arising from regenerated urothelium over lyophilized dura patch.
Selli C; Carcangiu ML; Carini M
Urology; 1986 Jan; 27(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 3942022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The neoformation of intestinal mucosa on dura mater patches. An experimental study in rats].
Hernández Bermejo JP
Cir Pediatr; 1990 Jul; 3(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 2073479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium: experimental study.
Buson H; Manivel JC; Dayanç M; Long R; Gonzalez R
Urology; 1994 Nov; 44(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 7974949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bladder augmentation with different forms of intestinal grafts: an experimental study in the pig.
Clementson Kockum C; Willén R; Malmfors G
BJU Int; 1999 Feb; 83(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 10233500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histologic and functional outcomes of small intestine submucosa-regenerated bladder tissue.
Wang Y; Liao L
BMC Urol; 2014 Aug; 14():69. PubMed ID: 25148849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
