These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

720 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9467758)

  • 1. Instructed faking and MMPI-2 response latencies: the potential for assessing response validity.
    Brunetti DG; Schlottmann RS; Scott AB; Mihura JL
    J Clin Psychol; 1998 Feb; 54(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 9467758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting fake-good and fake-bad MMPI-2 profiles.
    Graham JR; Watts D; Timbrook RE
    J Pers Assess; 1991 Oct; 57(2):264-77. PubMed ID: 1955975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of the MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales in Detection of Simulated Underreporting: Implications of Incorporating a Manipulation Check.
    Crighton AH; Marek RJ; Dragon WR; Ben-Porath YS
    Assessment; 2017 Oct; 24(7):853-864. PubMed ID: 26851055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the PAI and MMPI-2 as predictors of faking bad in college students.
    Blanchard DD; McGrath RE; Pogge DL; Khadivi A
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Apr; 80(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 12700022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of overreported psychopathology with the MMPI-2-RF [corrected] validity scales.
    Sellbom M; Bagby RM
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Dec; 22(4):757-67. PubMed ID: 21133544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Faking the MMPI-2: utility of the Subtle-Obvious scales.
    Brems C; Harris K
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 Sep; 52(5):525-33. PubMed ID: 8877687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of overreporting on MMPI-2-RF substantive scale score validity.
    Burchett DL; Ben-Porath YS
    Assessment; 2010 Dec; 17(4):497-516. PubMed ID: 20739584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of the Deceptive-Subtle items in the detection of malingering.
    Bagby RM; Nicholson R; Buis T
    J Pers Assess; 1998 Jun; 70(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 9841263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent validity of the MCMI-II modifier indices.
    Blais MA; Benedict KB; Norman DK
    J Clin Psychol; 1995 Nov; 51(6):783-9. PubMed ID: 8778126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evaluation of truthfulness in alleged sex offenders' self-reports: 16PF and MMPI validity scales.
    Grossman LS; Haywood TW; Wasyliw OE
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Oct; 59(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 1432560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting malingered and defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in a forensic inpatient sample.
    Bagby RM; Rogers R; Buis T
    J Pers Assess; 1994 Apr; 62(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 8189330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting fake-bad MMPI-A profiles.
    Stein LA; Graham JR; Williams CL
    J Pers Assess; 1995 Dec; 65(3):415-27. PubMed ID: 16367708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of description clarity and disorder type on MMPI-2 FAKE-BAD validity indices.
    Cramer KM
    J Clin Psychol; 1995 Nov; 51(6):831-40. PubMed ID: 8778133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing MMPI constructs through the measurement of response latencies.
    Popham SM; Holden RR
    J Pers Assess; 1990; 54(3-4):469-78. PubMed ID: 2348336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of MCMI subtle and obvious subscales to detect faking.
    Wierzbicki M
    J Clin Psychol; 1993 Nov; 49(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 8300869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection of malingering and deception with a short form of the MMPI-2 based on the L, F, and K scales.
    Cassisi JE; Workman DE
    J Clin Psychol; 1992 Jan; 48(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 1556216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MMPI validity measures: a comparative study of original with alternative indices.
    Woychyshyn CA; McElheran WG; Romney DM
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Feb; 58(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 1545338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Response Bias on the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5).
    McGee Ng SA; Bagby RM; Goodwin BE; Burchett D; Sellbom M; Ayearst LE; Dhillon S; Yiu S; Ben-Porath YS; Baker S
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 26583767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of the MMPI-2-RF (restructured form) L-r and K-r scales in detecting underreporting in clinical and nonclinical samples.
    Sellbom M; Bagby RM
    Psychol Assess; 2008 Dec; 20(4):370-6. PubMed ID: 19086760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Introducing Machine Learning to Detect Personality Faking-Good in a Male Sample: A New Model Based on Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form Scales and Reaction Times.
    Mazza C; Monaro M; Orrù G; Burla F; Colasanti M; Ferracuti S; Roma P
    Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():389. PubMed ID: 31275176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.