These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9467987)

  • 1. Marginal fit consistency of copy-milled all-ceramic crowns during fabrication by light and scanning electron microscopic analysis in vitro.
    Groten M; Girthofer S; Pröbster L
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 9467987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems.
    Balkaya MC; Cinar A; Pamuk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 15798685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems.
    Yeo IS; Yang JH; Lee JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):459-64. PubMed ID: 14586310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro fitting accuracy of copy-milled alumina cores and all-ceramic crowns.
    Nakamura T; Nonaka M; Maruyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 11203630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in five ceramic restoration fabricating techniques.
    Ural C; Burgaz Y; Saraç D
    Quintessence Int; 2010; 41(7):585-90. PubMed ID: 20614046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
    Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro study on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns.
    Nakamura T; Tanaka H; Kinuta S; Akao T; Okamoto K; Wakabayashi K; Yatani H
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):456-9. PubMed ID: 16279739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In-Ceram failure behavior and core-veneer interface quality as influenced by residual infiltration glass.
    Carrier DD; Kelly JR
    J Prosthodont; 1995 Dec; 4(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 8601181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations.
    Holden JE; Goldstein GR; Hittelman EL; Clark EA
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 19682215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of multiple firings on the marginal integrity of pressable ceramic single crowns.
    Cho SH; Nagy WW; Goodman JT; Solomon E; Koike M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jan; 107(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 22230912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of finish line curvature on marginal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns and metal-ceramic crowns.
    Tao J; Han D
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):745-52. PubMed ID: 19862401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study.
    Schaefer O; Kuepper H; Thompson GA; Cachovan G; Hefti AF; Guentsch A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 23743092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.