These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond. Fischer GM; Stewart GP; Panelli J Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 7803002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations. Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The bonded amalgam restoration. Denehy GE Dent Econ; 1993 Jun; 83(6):104-5. PubMed ID: 8243775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 2: Further studies and clinical technique. Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):361-2. PubMed ID: 9515443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of amalgam restorations: undercuts versus bonding. Staninec M Quintessence Int; 1989 May; 20(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 2667020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Revisiting amalgam: a comparative study between bonded amalgam restoration and amalgam retained with undercuts. Gupta I; Gupta S; Kothari A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 22186810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of preparation designs and adhesive systems on retention of class II amalgam restorations. Görücü J; Tiritoglu M; Ozgünaltay G J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9297640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amalgam restorations: a new approach. al-Duwairi Y; Hadj-Hamou R J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 8429504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bonded silver amalgam restorations. Jordan RE; Suzuki M; Balanko M J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Oct; 58(10):817-9. PubMed ID: 1393794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of dentin-bonding-amalgam interfaces. Geiger SB; Mazor Y; Klein E; Judes H Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 11357565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations. Della Bona A; Summitt JB Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage. Al-Jazairy YH; Louka AN Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Amalgam Restorations: To Bond or Not. Larson TD Northwest Dent; 2015; 94(5):35-7. PubMed ID: 26596104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current adhesive dentistry as an alternative to amalgam: case history. Adams T Dent Today; 2001 Mar; 20(3):82-5. PubMed ID: 12524873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Amalgam bonding. Williams TO J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 131(6):723-4. PubMed ID: 10860319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and Copalite. Edgren BN; Denehy GE Am J Dent; 1992 Dec; 5(6):296-8. PubMed ID: 1304174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]