469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9471807)
21. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration.
Costa CG; Tortamano IP; Rocha RG; Francischone CE; Tortamano N
Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar; 36(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 15887505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
Colombini BL; Modena KC; Calvo AM; Sakai VT; Giglio FP; Dionísio TJ; Trindade AS; Lauris JR; Santos CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 16876058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Plasma catecholamine concentrations and hemodynamic responses to vasoconstrictor during conventional or Gow-Gates mandibular anesthesia.
Viana AM; Campos AC; Morlin MT; Chin VK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Oct; 100(4):415-9. PubMed ID: 16182162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Clinical and physiological rationale for use of clonidine with articaine and adrenaline for local anesthesia in pediatric dentistry].
Mel'nikova AV; Shugaĭlov IA
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2014; 93(3):48-52. PubMed ID: 24990788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative investigations on the efficacy of articaine 4% (epinephrine 1:200,000) and articaine 2% (epinephrine 1:200,000) in local infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry--a randomised double-blind study.
Hintze A; Paessler L
Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Jun; 10(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16491339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Epinephrine and local anesthesia revisited.
Brown RS; Rhodus NL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Oct; 100(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 16182160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Evans G; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 18358883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):296-8. PubMed ID: 16554198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the intraoral, infraorbital nerve block.
Berberich G; Reader A; Drum M; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1498-504. PubMed ID: 19840637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [New anesthetics].
Malamed SF
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2000; 55(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 11039279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Mason R; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19720211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the anesthetic effect of epinephrine-free articaine and mepivacaine through quantitative sensory testing.
Said Yekta-Michael S; Stein JM; Marioth-Wirtz E
Head Face Med; 2015 Feb; 11():2. PubMed ID: 25889698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and mepivacaine in pediatric patients: a randomized, double-blind study.
Odabaş ME; Cınar C; Deveci C; Alaçam A
Pediatr Dent; 2012; 34(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 22353456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Aggarwal V; Jain A; Kabi D
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):925-9. PubMed ID: 19567309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Efficacy and safety of intraseptal and periodontal ligament anesthesia achieved by computer-controlled articaine + epinephrine delivery: a dose-finding study.
Biocanin V; Brkovic B; Milicic B; Stojic D
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):525-33. PubMed ID: 22526891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An Investigation into Dental Local Anaesthesia Teaching in United Kingdom Dental Schools.
Oliver G; DavidD A; Bell C; Robb N
SAAD Dig; 2016 Jan; 32():7-13. PubMed ID: 27145553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Need for a change? Articaine vs. lidocaine.
Daublander MM
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2011; 57(5):265-7. PubMed ID: 22165477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Alterations in monitored vital constants induced by various local anesthetics in combination with different vasoconstrictors in the surgical removal of lower third molars.
Carrera I; Mestre R; Berini L; Gay-Escoda C
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2000; 42(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11799734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Srinivasan N; Kavitha M; Loganathan CS; Padmini G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19101495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars.
Corbett IP; Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2008 May; 34(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18436027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
