These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9472734)

  • 21. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Wen H; Szabo P; Cecola RP; Rigby P; Jackson DF
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 8113128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The First Jerger Lecture. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: an index of the function of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Hurley A; Wen H
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Jan; 110(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 8290299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in children. pure tone 1.0 kHz and 2.0 kHz suppressive effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission.
    Morawski K; Namyslowski G; Kossowska I; Lisowska G; Urbaniec P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):112-5. PubMed ID: 11318438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech-in-noise perception ability can be related to auditory efferent pathway function: a comparative study in reading impaired and normal reading children.
    Akbari M; Panahi R; Valadbeigi A; Hamadi Nahrani M
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 30772249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Suppression of otoacoustic emission is unchanged after several minutes of contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Giraud AL; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):78-82. PubMed ID: 9259237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peripheral auditory lateralization assessment using TEOAEs.
    Khalfa S; Micheyl C; Veuillet E; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1998 Jul; 121(1-2):29-34. PubMed ID: 9682805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The application of otoacoustic emissions measurement in the assessment of the function of cochlear efferent fibers: the study of normal hearing subjects].
    Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10337165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise.
    Kumar UA; Vanaja CS
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 15064659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ryan S; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Magnitude of medial olivocochlear reflex assayed by tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions: reliability and comparison with click-evoked emissions.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Pastucha M; Skarzynski H; Kochanek K
    Int J Audiol; 2024 May; 63(5):293-299. PubMed ID: 37129585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.