These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9472748)

  • 21. Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones.
    Long G
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 9641318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Otoacoustic emissions in preterm infants: indications for cochlear development?
    Brienesse P; Anteunis L; Wit H; Gavilanes D; Maertzdorf W
    Audiology; 1996; 35(6):296-306. PubMed ID: 9018364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
    Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigating possible mechanisms behind the effect of threshold fine structure on amplitude modulation perception.
    Heise SJ; Mauermann M; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2490-500. PubMed ID: 19894829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.
    Dewey JB; Lee J; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):897-914. PubMed ID: 25245498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Behaviour of delayed evoked otoacoustic emission under forward masking paradigm.
    Gobsch H; Kevanishvili Z; Gamgebeli Z; Gvelesiani T
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 1439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions.
    McFadden D; Mishra R
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8113138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Bulut E; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) on transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE)].
    Kuroda T; Fukuda S; Chida E; Kashiwamura M; Matsumura M; Oowatari R; Inuyama Y; Sato N
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2000 Oct; 103(10):1135-40. PubMed ID: 11109822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of AC and DC stimulation on chinchilla SOAE amplitude and frequency.
    Sun W; Ding D; Reyes S; Salvi RJ
    Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):137-48. PubMed ID: 11077199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can synchronized otoacoustic emissions really be attributed to SOAEs?
    Wable J; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1994 Nov; 80(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 7896572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gender differences in contralateral suppression of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders.
    Nisha KV; Loganathan MK; Prabhu P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Mar; 280(3):1493-1499. PubMed ID: 36374345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory enhancement at the absolute threshold of hearing and its relationship to the Zwicker tone.
    Wiegrebe L; Kössl M; Schmidt S
    Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 100(1-2):171-80. PubMed ID: 8922992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes.
    Ozturan O; Oysu C
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):129-36. PubMed ID: 9925024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C; Sininger YS; Ekelid M; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 8880180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interaction of spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions and external sounds.
    Rabinowitz WM; Widin GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1713-20. PubMed ID: 6520309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.