These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9472832)

  • 1. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ; Reimann DA
    Med Phys; 1998 Jan; 25(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 9472832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the accuracy of MTF measurement at low frequencies based on oversampled edge spread function deconvolution.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Hao T; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 26410662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.
    Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2323-31. PubMed ID: 14528954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of the two-dimensional presampled modulation transfer function of digital radiography devices using one-dimensional test objects.
    Wells JR; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6148-60. PubMed ID: 23039654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of the line-pair bar-pattern method in the measurement of the modulation transfer function (MTF) in megavoltage imaging.
    Gopal A; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 18293582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation.
    Neitzel U; Buhr E; Hilgers G; Granfors PR
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3485-91. PubMed ID: 15651631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of digital X-ray detectors with an opaque edge-test device.
    Illers H; Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15933111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A method of measuring presampled modulation transfer function using a rationalized approximation of geometrical edge slope].
    Honda M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Apr; 70(4):346-58. PubMed ID: 24759215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire, and edge techniques.
    Cunningham IA; Reid BK
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1037-44. PubMed ID: 1518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9949395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of computed radiographic systems by use of the edge method.
    Tanaka N; Morishita J; Tsuda N; Ohki M
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):474-9. PubMed ID: 23733485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monotone spline regression for accurate MTF measurement at low frequencies.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Liu H
    Opt Express; 2014 Sep; 22(19):22446-55. PubMed ID: 25321715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images.
    Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Budi WS; Haryanto F; Dougherty G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):244-252. PubMed ID: 30338920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ; Schueler BA; Ritenour ER
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):913-21. PubMed ID: 12033588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Proposal and verification of presampled MTF measurement by simple analysis using the edge method].
    Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Kunitomo H; Sawada M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Apr; 64(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 18451598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.