These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9472832)

  • 21. Techniques to improve the accuracy of presampling MTF measurement in digital X-ray imaging based on constrained spline regression.
    Zhou Z; Zhu Q; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ma W; Gao F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1339-49. PubMed ID: 24658257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems.
    Marshall NW; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7629-50. PubMed ID: 23123601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of a variable filter for presampled modulation transfer function analysis with the edge method.
    Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Kunitomo H; Ohashi K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jul; 8(2):320-30. PubMed ID: 26088943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Singular value description of a digital radiographic detector: theory and measurements.
    Kyprianou IS; Badano A; Gallas BD; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4744-56. PubMed ID: 18975719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Influence of angle-measurement error on pre-sampled MTF and proposal of an optimal technique of angle measurement].
    Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Kunitomo H; Ohashi K; Kawano M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Feb; 65(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 19246860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography.
    Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2001 Mar; 28(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 11318317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems.
    Gomi T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 16395244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems.
    Flynn MJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1612-23. PubMed ID: 10501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography.
    Nakaya Y; Kawata Y; Niki N; Umetatni K; Ohmatsu H; Moriyama N
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of scattered radiation from a semitransparent edge on MTF measurement: verification of several factors by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Maruyama S; Shimosegawa M
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 43(2):547-556. PubMed ID: 32524439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determining the MTF of medical imaging displays using edge techniques.
    Chawla AS; Roehrig H; Rodriguez JJ; Fan J
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):296-310. PubMed ID: 16132485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3167-80. PubMed ID: 22755701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 11991117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sinusoidal modulation analysis for optical system MTF measurements.
    Boone JM; Yu T; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1955-63. PubMed ID: 8994160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of noise on MTF calculations using different phantoms.
    González-López A
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1889-1898. PubMed ID: 29500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modulation transfer function measurement of CT images by use of a circular edge method with a logistic curve-fitting technique.
    Takenaga T; Katsuragawa S; Goto M; Hatemura M; Uchiyama Y; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jan; 8(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 25142743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.
    Gislason-Lee AJ; Tunstall CM; Kengyelics SK; Cowen AR; Davies AG
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4423-7. PubMed ID: 26233172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.