160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9472910)
1. Evaluation of home blood pressure monitors in children and adolescents.
Wells TG; Neaville WA; Arnold JR; Belsha CW
Am J Med Sci; 1998 Feb; 315(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9472910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Schiller BR-102 ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Feb; 4(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10362889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Mee F; Atkins N; O'Brien E
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 10212377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Tensioday ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Németh Z; Móczár K; Deák G
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Jun; 7(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12131077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer.
Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainty' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist.
Dieterle T; Battegay E; Bucheli B; Martina B
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10212375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of a new wrist cuff oscillometric blood pressure device: comparisons with intraarterial and mercury manometer measurements.
Watson S; Wenzel RR; di Matteo C; Meier B; Lüscher TF
Am J Hypertens; 1998 Dec; 11(12):1469-74. PubMed ID: 9880129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Omron MX3 Plus monitor for blood pressure measurement in adolescents.
Christofaro DG; Casonatto J; Polito MD; Cardoso JR; Fernandes R; Guariglia DA; Gerage AM; de Oliveira AR
Eur J Pediatr; 2009 Nov; 168(11):1349-54. PubMed ID: 19221789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of A&D UA-767 device for the self-measurement of blood pressure.
Rogoza AN; Pavlova TS; Sergeeva MV
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Aug; 5(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 11035865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can aneroid sphygmomanometers be used at altitude?
Kametas NA; McAuliffe F; Krampl E; Nicolaides KH; Shennan AH
J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 16617312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Omron HEM-713C automated blood pressure monitor with a standard ausculatory method using a mercury manometer.
Mufunda J; Sparks B; Chifamba J; Dakwa C; Matenga JA; Adams JM; Sparks HV
Cent Afr J Med; 1996 Aug; 42(8):230-2. PubMed ID: 8990566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the European Society of Hypertension, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the British Society of Hypertension.
Zaetta V; Daniele L; Perkovic D; Pratticò F; Barisa M; Perfetti P; Gabrieli A; Buonocore F; Winnicki M
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 18004104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the SpaceLabs 90202 non-invasive ambulatory recorder according to the AAMI Standard and BHS criteria.
O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
J Hum Hypertens; 1991 Jun; 5(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 1920345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of automated blood pressure monitors.
Nelson D; Kennedy B; Regnerus C; Schweinle A
J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(4):35. PubMed ID: 18755068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor in adults and children based on the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standards.
Ling J; Ohara Y; Orime Y; Noon GP; Takatani S
J Clin Monit; 1995 Mar; 11(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 7760085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
