199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9474058)
1. Usefulness of neurogenic motor evoked potentials for spinal cord monitoring: findings in 112 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity.
Péréon Y; Bernard JM; Fayet G; Delécrin J; Passuti N; Guihéneuc P
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jan; 108(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9474058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Monitoring the neurogenic mixed evoked potentials during surgery of the spine: a good solution?].
Péréon Y; Nguyen The Tich S
Neurophysiol Clin; 1998 Sep; 28(4):321-34. PubMed ID: 9793064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Neurogenic mixed evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery: retrospective analysis of 149 cases].
Delécrin J; Nguyen The Tich S; Passuti N; Péréon Y
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Feb; 86(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 10669824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between evoked potentials and clinical status in spinal cord ischemia.
Kai Y; Owen JH; Allen BT; Dobras M; Davis C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 May; 19(10):1162-7; discussion 1167-8. PubMed ID: 8059274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Loss of spinal cord monitoring signals in children during thoracic kyphosis correction with spinal osteotomy: why does it occur and what should you do?
Cheh G; Lenke LG; Padberg AM; Kim YJ; Daubs MD; Kuhns C; Stobbs G; Hensley M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 18449043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined spinal cord monitoring using neurogenic mixed evoked potentials and collision techniques.
Péréon Y; Nguyen The Tich S; Delécrin J; Pham Dang C; Bodin J; Drouet JC; Passuti N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jul; 27(14):1571-6. PubMed ID: 12131720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct spinal stimulation for intraoperative monitoring during scoliosis surgery.
Phillips LH; Blanco JS; Sussman MD
Muscle Nerve; 1995 Mar; 18(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 7870110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neurogenic motor evoked potentials: a prospective comparison of stimulation methods in spinal deformity surgery.
Komanetsky RM; Padberg AM; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Russo MH; Chapman MP; Hamill CL
J Spinal Disord; 1998 Feb; 11(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 9493766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective comparison of neurogenic mixed evoked potential stimulation methods: utility of epidural elicitation during posterior spinal surgery.
Wilson-Holden TJ; Padberg AM; Parkinson JD; Bridwell KH; Lenke LG; Bassett GS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Sep; 25(18):2364-71. PubMed ID: 10984790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Threshold-level" multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring.
Calancie B; Harris W; Broton JG; Alexeeva N; Green BA
J Neurosurg; 1998 Mar; 88(3):457-70. PubMed ID: 9488299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Successful monitoring of neurogenic mixed evoked potentials elicited by anterior spinal cord stimulation through thoracoscopy during spine surgery.
Péréon Y; Delécrin J; Nguyeni The Tich SN; Bertrand-Vasseur A; Passuti N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(19):2025-9. PubMed ID: 10528379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative neuromonitoring alerts in a pediatric deformity center.
Zuccaro M; Zuccaro J; Samdani AF; Pahys JM; Hwang SW
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Oct; 43(4):E8. PubMed ID: 28965444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Removing the antidromically driven sensory component from cervically evoked motor potentials.
Rose RD
Med Hypotheses; 1998 Feb; 50(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 9572570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular spinal deformity surgery.
Padberg AM; Russo MH; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Komanetsky RM
J Spinal Disord; 1996 Apr; 9(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 8793784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monopolar-probe monitoring during spinal surgery with expandable prosthetic ribs.
Gomes C; Kuchenbuch M; Lucas G; Sauleau P; Violas P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 101(4 Suppl):S193-7. PubMed ID: 25890812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical activity after stimulation of the corticospinal tract in the spinal cord.
Costa P; Deletis V
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1726-1733. PubMed ID: 26679418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring in children with Down syndrome.
Patel AJ; Agadi S; Thomas JG; Schmidt RJ; Hwang SW; Fulkerson DH; Glover CD; Jea A
Childs Nerv Syst; 2013 Feb; 29(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 23089932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Motor-Evoked Potentials Versus Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials as Early Indicators of Neural Compromise in Rat Model of Spinal Cord Compression.
Morris SH; Howard JJ; El-Hawary R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Mar; 42(6):E326-E331. PubMed ID: 27496665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during instrumented scoliosis corrective procedures: validity revisited.
Thirumala PD; Bodily L; Tint D; Ward WT; Deeney VF; Crammond DJ; Habeych ME; Balzer JR
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1572-80. PubMed ID: 24361128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity and specificity of somatosensory and neurogenic-motor evoked potentials in animals and humans.
Owen JH; Laschinger J; Bridwell K; Shimon S; Nielsen C; Dunlap J; Kain C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1988 Oct; 13(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 3061024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
