These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9474341)

  • 1. Loss of 3-D shape constancy in interior spaces: the basis of the Ames-room illusion.
    Dorward FM; Day RH
    Perception; 1997; 26(6):707-18. PubMed ID: 9474341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of ecological viewing conditions on the Ames' distorted room illusion.
    Gehringer WL; Engel E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 May; 12(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 2940322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emmert's law in the Ames room.
    Dwyer J; Ashton R; Broerse J
    Perception; 1990; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 2336333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Ames window illusion: perception of illusory motion by human infants.
    Oross S; Francis E; Mauk D; Fox R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Nov; 13(4):609-13. PubMed ID: 2965753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retinal projection or size constancy as determinants of the horizontal-vertical illusion?
    von Collani G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):547-57. PubMed ID: 4069920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of stereopsis, motion parallax, perspective and angle polarity in perceiving 3-D shape.
    Sherman A; Papathomas TV; Jain A; Keane BP
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(3-4):263-85. PubMed ID: 21771395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovering 3-D shape: roles of absolute and relative disparity, retinal size, and viewing distance as studied with reverse-perspective stimuli.
    Dobias JJ; Papathomas TV
    Perception; 2013; 42(4):430-46. PubMed ID: 23866556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The apparent shape of afterimages in the Ames room.
    Broerse J; Ashton R; Shaw C
    Perception; 1992; 21(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 1513674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The absence of depth constancy in contour stereograms.
    Vreven D; Welch L
    Perception; 2001; 30(6):693-705. PubMed ID: 11464558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Reversed' illusion with three-dimensional Müller-Lyer shapes.
    Nijhawan R
    Perception; 1995; 24(11):1281-96. PubMed ID: 8643333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of monocular versus binocular viewing in the Ames Distorted-Room illusion.
    Pilewski JL; Martin BA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):306. PubMed ID: 2038529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of perceptual cues in the trapezoid oscillatory illusion.
    Martinetti RF
    J Gen Psychol; 1975 Jan; 92(1st Half):129-35. PubMed ID: 1113085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions.
    Wenderoth P; Burke D
    Perception; 2006; 35(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 16583766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The apparent distance of interior and exterior corners: a test of Gregory's misapplied size constancy explanation for the Mueller-Lyer illusion.
    McGraw KO; Stanford J
    J Gen Psychol; 1994 Jan; 121(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 8021629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size.
    Bradshaw MF; Parton AD; Eagle RA
    Perception; 1998; 27(11):1317-31. PubMed ID: 10505177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The distorted room illusion, equivalent configurations, and the specificity of static optic arrays.
    Runeson S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 2967881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of binocular viewing in a spacing illusion arising in a darkened surround.
    Suzuki K
    Perception; 1998; 27(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 9775317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cues to viewing distance for stereoscopic depth constancy.
    Glennerster A; Rogers BJ; Bradshaw MF
    Perception; 1998; 27(11):1357-65. PubMed ID: 10505180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Color Constancy in Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Scenes: Effects of Viewing Methods and Surface Texture.
    Morimoto T; Mizokami Y; Yaguchi H; Buck SL
    Iperception; 2017; 8(6):2041669517743522. PubMed ID: 29238513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of face configuration change on shape perception: a new illusion.
    Lee K; Freire A
    Perception; 1999; 28(10):1217-26. PubMed ID: 10694969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.