These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9474624)

  • 1. Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Naitoh M; Yuasa H; Toyama M; Shiojima M; Nakamura M; Ushida M; Iida H; Hayashi M; Ariji E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 9474624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor.
    Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Yüksel SP; Cebeci AR; Paksoy CS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e63-9. PubMed ID: 20416522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Anthonisen PN; Juul MB
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10867419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8508938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TACT imaging of primary caries.
    Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observer differentiation of proximal enamel mechanical defects versus natural proximal dental caries with computed dental radiography.
    Kang BC; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Oct; 82(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 8899789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA; Makins SR; Bretz WA
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-automated caries detection in digital bitewings: consistency of a program and its influence on observer agreement.
    Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 11125191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.
    Senel B; Kamburoglu K; Uçok O; Yüksel SP; Ozen T; Avsever H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Dec; 39(8):501-11. PubMed ID: 21062944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.