232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9474646)
1. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers.
Leung SK; Lau CP; Tang MO
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):35-41. PubMed ID: 9474646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative comparison of rate response and oxygen uptake kinetics between different sensor modes in multisensor rate adaptive pacing.
Leung SK; Lau CP; Wu CW; Leung WH; Tai YT; Lee I; Chow YH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 17(11 Pt 2):1920-7. PubMed ID: 7845792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Delayed exercise rate response kinetics due to sensor cross-checking in a dual sensor rate adaptive pacing system: the importance of individual sensor programming.
Lau CP; Leung SK; Lee IS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jul; 19(7):1021-5. PubMed ID: 8823827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-year experience with rate-modulated pacing controlled by mixed venous oxygen saturation.
Windecker S; Bubien RS; Halperin L; Moore A; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1396-404. PubMed ID: 9670183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of sensor selection on exercise stroke volume in pacemaker dependent patients.
Haennel RG; Logan T; Dunne C; Burgess J; Busse E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 21(9):1700-8. PubMed ID: 9744431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: is it worth it?
Sulke N; Tan K; Kamalvand K; Bostock J; Bucknall C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1560-7. PubMed ID: 8946451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cardiac pacing modes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Jutzy RV; Houston-Feenstra L; Levine PA
Chest; 1994 Jan; 105(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 8275792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of rate modulated dual chamber and VVIR pacing.
Jutzy RV; Florio J; Isaeff DM; Marsa RJ; Bansal RC; Jutzy KR; Levine PA; Feenstra L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1838-46. PubMed ID: 1704551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual sensor pacemakers in children: what is the choice of sensor blending?
Celiker A; Tokel K; Lenk MK; Ozme S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 May; 20(5 Pt 1):1301-4. PubMed ID: 9170130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Activity-sensing rate responsive versus conventional fixed-rate pacing: a comparison of rate behavior and patient well-being during routine daily exercise.
Candinas RA; Gloor HO; Amann FW; Schoenbeck M; Turina M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb; 14(2 Pt 1):204-13. PubMed ID: 1706506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac output in single-lead VDD pacing versus rate-matched VVIR pacing.
Nowak B; Voigtländer T; Himmrich E; Liebrich A; Poschmann G; Epperlein S; Treese N; Meyer J
Am J Cardiol; 1995 May; 75(14):904-7. PubMed ID: 7732998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New integrated sensor pacemaker: comparison of rate responses between an integrated minute ventilation and activity sensor and single sensor modes during exercise and daily activities and nonphysiological interference.
Leung SK; Lau CP; Tang MO; Leung Z
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1664-71. PubMed ID: 8945021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized, single-blind crossover comparison of the effects of chronic DDD and dual sensor VVIR pacing mode on quality-of-life and cardiopulmonary performance in complete heart block.
Deharo JC; Badier M; Thirion X; Ritter P; Provenier F; Graux P; Guillot C; Mugica J; Jordaens L; Djiane P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Sep; 19(9):1320-6. PubMed ID: 8880795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of continuously recorded sensor and sinus rates during daily life activities and standardized exercise testing: efficacy of automatically optimized rate adaptive dual sensor pacing to simulate sinus rhythm.
Lau CP; Leung SK; Guerola M; Crijns HJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1672-7. PubMed ID: 8945022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is accurate rate response programming necessary?
Sulke N; Dritsas A; Chambers J; Sowton E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing.
Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X
Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
