These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations available to an atrioventricular defibrillator. Benser ME; Walcott GP; Killingsworth CR; Girouard SD; Morris MM; Ideker RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 11513449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Energy steering of biphasic waveforms using a transvenous three electrode system. Leonelli FM; Wang KE; King C; Brewer J; Donohoo AM; Kroll MW Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jun; 22(6 Pt 1):849-54. PubMed ID: 10392381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relation between ventricular fibrillation voltage and probability of defibrillation shocks. Analysis using Hilbert transforms. Patwardhan A; Moghe S; Wang K; Cruise H; Leonelli F J Electrocardiol; 1998 Oct; 31(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 9817215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fixed tilt and tuned defibrillation waveforms: the PROMISE study. Gold MR; Val-Mejias J; Cuoco F; Siddiqui M J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 23210764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Hilbert transform analysis of the relation between ventricular fibrillation voltage and the outcome of defibrillation shocks]. Wang K; Deng X; Guo R; Patwardhan A; Leonelli F Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 23(3):512-6. PubMed ID: 16856380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations. Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selecting the transthoracic defibrillation shock directional vector based on VF amplitude improves shock success. Brooks L; Zhang Y; Dendi R; Anderson RH; Zimmerman B; Kerber RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 19460079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode. Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of polarity for monophasic and biphasic shocks on defibrillation efficacy with an endocardial system. Usui M; Walcott GP; Strickberger SA; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 8848379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function. Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Yamaguchi H; Povoas HP; Pernat AM; Bisera J J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 34(3):815-22. PubMed ID: 10483965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway. Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transseptal defibrillation is superior for transvenous defibrillation. Singer I; Goldsmith J; Maldonado C Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 2):229-32. PubMed ID: 7724405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]