These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Transvenous single lead atrial defibrillation: efficacy and risk of ventricular fibrillation in an ischemic canine model. Osswald S; Trouton TG; Roelke M; O'Nunain SS; Fallon JT; Holden HB; Ruskin JN; Garan H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):580-9. PubMed ID: 9558691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system. Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans. Sweeney MO; Natale A; Volosin KJ; Swerdlow CD; Baker JH; Degroot P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11227971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bispectral energies within electrocardiograms during ventricular fibrillation are correlated with defibrillation shock outcome. Patwardhan A; Wang K; Moghe S; Leonelli F Ann Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 10199693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems. Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location. Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Low-tilt monophasic and biphasic waveforms compared with standard biphasic waveforms in the transvenous defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation. Bennett JR; Darragh KM; Walsh SJ; Allen DJ; Scott M; Stevenson M; Adgey JA; Anderson JM; Manoharan G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Mar; 37(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 24102186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation. Strobel JS; Kenknight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 32(2):521-7. PubMed ID: 9708486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Overlapping sequential pulses. A new waveform for transthoracic defibrillation. Kerber RE; Spencer KT; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Smith R; Yoerger D; Kieso RA Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2369-79. PubMed ID: 8181163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations. Matula MH; Brooks MJ; Pan Q; Pless BD; Province RA; Echt DS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2154-62. PubMed ID: 9309738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system. Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A systematic evaluation of conventional and novel transvenous pathways for defibrillation. Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Dahl RW; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 3(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10490479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Novel intravascular defibrillator: defibrillation thresholds of intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator compared to conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a canine model. Sanders WE; Richey MW; Malkin RA; Masson SC; Ransbury TJ; Urtz MW; Ideker RE Heart Rhythm; 2011 Feb; 8(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 21034853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Position of epicardial patch electrodes for implantable defibrillation significantly affects shock strength requirements. KenKnight BH; Heil JE; Hahn SJ; Lang DJ Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 2(1):50-5, discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 7606614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Analysis of ventricular fibrillation signals for the evaluation of defibrillation success in the treatment of ventricular fibrillation]. Lederer W; Rheinberger K; Lischke V; Amann A Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Dec; 38(12):787-94. PubMed ID: 14666442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]