These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9476047)
1. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil for node-positive breast cancer: a lifetime cost-utility analysis based on a modified Q-TWIST method. Trippoli S; Becagli P; Messori A Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1997; 53(3-4):281-2. PubMed ID: 9476047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Q-TWiST analysis of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil treatment for premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. Radice D; Redaelli A Pharmacoeconomics; 2005; 23(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 15693729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Messori A; Becagli P; Trippoli S; Tendi E Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1996; 51(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 8911873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying trade-offs: quality of life and quality-adjusted survival in a randomised trial of chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer. Bernhard J; Zahrieh D; Coates AS; Gelber RD; Castiglione-Gertsch M; Murray E; Forbes JF; Perey L; Collins J; Snyder R; Rudenstam CM; Crivellari D; Veronesi A; Thürlimann B; Fey MF; Price KN; Goldhirsch A; Hürny C Br J Cancer; 2004 Nov; 91(11):1893-901. PubMed ID: 15545973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endocrine responsiveness and tailoring adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal lymph node-negative breast cancer: a randomized trial. International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jul; 94(14):1054-65. PubMed ID: 12122096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil for the treatment of node-negative breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors: eight-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-13 and first report of findings from NSABP B-19 comparing methotrexate and fluorouracil with conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. Fisher B; Dignam J; Mamounas EP; Costantino JP; Wickerham DL; Redmond C; Wolmark N; Dimitrov NV; Bowman DM; Glass AG; Atkins JN; Abramson N; Sutherland CM; Aron BS; Margolese RG J Clin Oncol; 1996 Jul; 14(7):1982-92. PubMed ID: 8683228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and vincristine versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: final report after a 16-year median follow-up duration. Misset JL; di Palma M; Delgado M; Plagne R; Chollet P; Fumoleau P; Le Mevel B; Belpomme D; Guerrin J; Fargeot P; Metz R; Ithzaki M; Hill C; Mathé G J Clin Oncol; 1996 Apr; 14(4):1136-45. PubMed ID: 8648368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the outcomes of non-randomised chemotherapy regimens in node positive breast cancer. Kuru B; Camlibel M; Dinc S; Gulcelik MA; Atalay C; Alagol H J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Sep; 24(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 16270522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized, controlled trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil with and without tamoxifen for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: treatment results of Intergroup Protocol INT-0102. Hutchins LF; Green SJ; Ravdin PM; Lew D; Martino S; Abeloff M; Lyss AP; Allred C; Rivkin SE; Osborne CK J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(33):8313-21. PubMed ID: 16293862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral uracil and tegafur compared with classic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil as postoperative chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, high-risk breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Study for Breast Cancer 01 Trial. Watanabe T; Sano M; Takashima S; Kitaya T; Tokuda Y; Yoshimoto M; Kohno N; Nakagami K; Iwata H; Shimozuma K; Sonoo H; Tsuda H; Sakamoto G; Ohashi Y J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(9):1368-74. PubMed ID: 19204202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF) in breast cancer--is it cost-effective? Norum J Acta Oncol; 2000; 39(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 10752651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal breast cancer: a meta-analysis using quality-adjusted survival. Gelber RD; Cole BF; Goldhirsch A; Bonadonna G; Howell A; McArdle CS; Mouridsen HT; Rubens RD; Welvaart K Cancer J Sci Am; 1995; 1(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 9166464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of adjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate and fluorouracil with and without cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes. Shapiro CL; Gelman RS; Hayes DF; Osteen R; Obando A; Canellos GP; Frei E; Henderson IC J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 May; 85(10):812-7. PubMed ID: 8487326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3-year results of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer: a pilot study. Ferreira Filho AF; Crown J; Cardoso F; Nogaret JM; Duffy K; Dolci S; Rowan S; O'Higgins N; Batter V; Paesmans M; Piccart MJ; Di Leo A Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2471-6. PubMed ID: 12174946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus chlorambucil, methotrexate, and fluorouracil--11-year results of Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research trial SAKK 27/82. Senn HJ; Maibach R; Castiglione M; Jungi WF; Cavalli F; Leyvraz S; Obrecht JP; Schildknecht O; Siegenthaler P J Clin Oncol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):2502-9. PubMed ID: 9215818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural history of more than 20 years of node-positive primary breast carcinoma treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy: a study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Weiss RB; Woolf SH; Demakos E; Holland JF; Berry DA; Falkson G; Cirrincione CT; Robbins A; Bothun S; Henderson IC; Norton L; J Clin Oncol; 2003 May; 21(9):1825-35. PubMed ID: 12721260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premonopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: indirect comparison of dose and schedule in DBCG trials 77, 82, and 89. Ejlertsen B; Mouridsen HT; Jensen MB Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):662-71. PubMed ID: 18465334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) versus hormonal ablation with leuprorelin acetate as adjuvant treatment of node-positive, premenopausal breast cancer patients: preliminary results of the TABLE-study (Takeda Adjuvant Breast cancer study with Leuprorelin Acetate). Schmid P; Untch M; Wallwiener D; Kossé V; Bondar G; Vassiljev L; Tarutinov V; Kienle E; Lüftner D; Possinger K; Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2325-32. PubMed ID: 12174922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) versus CMF followed by epirubicin in patients with node-negative or 1-3 node-positive rapidly proliferating breast cancer. Amadori D; Silvestrini R; De Lena M; Boccardo F; Rocca A; Scarpi E; Schittulli F; Brandi M; Maltoni R; Serra P; Ponzone R; Biglia N; Gianni L; Tienghi A; Valerio MR; Bonginelli P; Amaducci L; Faedi M; Baldini E; Paradiso A Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 125(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 21132360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying good prognosis group of breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary nodes for adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy. Lin YC; Chen SC; Chang HK; Hsueh S; Tsai CS; Lo YF; Hwang TL; Chen MF Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep; 35(9):514-9. PubMed ID: 16199422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]