These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9476588)
1. Effect of coronary stenosis diameter on variability of on-line quantitative and qualitative arteriography. Lelonek M; Machraoui A Heart Vessels; 1997; Suppl 12():221-3. PubMed ID: 9476588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A comparative study of target vessel assessments by three- and two-dimensional quantitative coronary X-ray angiography and visual estimation]. Hao PY; Chen AH; Song XD; Wei XL; Zhou SS; He F; Tu SX Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2011 Feb; 31(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 21354924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic bias in the reporting of angioplasty outcomes: accuracy of visual estimates of absolute lumen diameters. Kimball BP; Bui S; Cohen EA; Cheung PK; Lima V Can J Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 10(8):815-20. PubMed ID: 7954016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angiography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis. Kalbfleisch SJ; McGillem MJ; Pinto IM; Kavanaugh KM; DeBoe SF; Mancini GB Am J Cardiol; 1990 May; 65(18):1181-4. PubMed ID: 2337026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images]. Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of quantitative computerized and human panel coronary endpoint measures: implications for the design of angiographic trials. Mack WJ; Azen SP; Dunn M; Hodis HN Control Clin Trials; 1997 Apr; 18(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 9129860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative coronary arteriography and its assessment of atherosclerosis. Part II. Calculating stenosis flow reserve from percent diameter stenosis. Fleming RM; Harrington GM Angiology; 1994 Oct; 45(10):835-40. PubMed ID: 7943934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of lumen area after PTCA by IVUS and QCA. Takazawa K; Fujita M; Tanaka N; Takeda K; Ishimaru M; Kowaguchi H; Matsuoka O; Kurosu F; Tamura S; Ibukiyama C Heart Vessels; 1997; Suppl 12():217-20. PubMed ID: 9476587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Park SJ; Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Shim EB; Kim YT; Yun SC; Song H; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Mintz GS; Park SW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1029-36. PubMed ID: 23078732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential progression of complex and smooth stenoses within the same coronary tree in men with stable coronary artery disease. Chester MR; Chen L; Tousoulis D; Poloniecki J; Kaski JC J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Mar; 25(4):837-42. PubMed ID: 7884085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? White CW; Wright CB; Doty DB; Hiratza LF; Eastham CL; Harrison DG; Marcus ML N Engl J Med; 1984 Mar; 310(13):819-24. PubMed ID: 6700670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative coronary arteriography and its assessment of atherosclerosis. Part I. Examining the independent variables. Fleming RM; Harrington GM; Gibbs HR; Swafford J Angiology; 1994 Oct; 45(10):829-33. PubMed ID: 7943933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. Fleming RM; Kirkeeide RL; Smalling RW; Gould KL J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 18(4):945-51. PubMed ID: 1894868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance standards and edge detection with computerized quantitative coronary arteriography. The Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Group. Klein JL; Boccuzzi SJ; Treasure CB; Manoukian SV; Vogel RA; Beauman GJ; Fischman D; Savage MP; Weintaub WS Am J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 77(10):815-22. PubMed ID: 8623732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of significant coronary artery disease in renal transplant candidates. Herzog CA; Marwick TH; Pheley AM; White CW; Rao VK; Dick CD Am J Kidney Dis; 1999 Jun; 33(6):1080-90. PubMed ID: 10352196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis, Assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers, and different cinefilmless laboratories. Sirnes PA; Myreng Y; Mølstad P; Golf S Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Sep; 12(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 8915721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Rigolin VH; Robiolio PA; Spero LA; Harrawood BP; Morris KG; Fortin DF; Baker WA; Bashore TM; Cusma JT Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jul; 78(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 8712131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. Scoblionko DP; Brown BG; Mitten S; Caldwell JH; Kennedy JW; Bolson EL; Dodge HT Am J Cardiol; 1984 Mar; 53(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 6702614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A maximum confidence approach for measuring progression and regression of coronary artery disease in clinical trials. Brown BG; Hillger LA; Lewis C; Zhao XQ; Sacco D; Bisson B; Fisher L Circulation; 1993 Mar; 87(3 Suppl):II66-73. PubMed ID: 8443926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]