These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9477092)
1. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group. Roder JD; Böttcher K; Busch R; Wittekind C; Hermanek P; Siewert JR Cancer; 1998 Feb; 82(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 9477092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined for the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification of gastric carcinoma. Ichikura T; Ogawa T; Chochi K; Kawabata T; Sugasawa H; Mochizuki H World J Surg; 2003 Mar; 27(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12607061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system. Celen O; Yildirim E; Gülben K; Berberoğlu U Eur J Surg Suppl; 2003 Jul; (588):33-9. PubMed ID: 15200041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Hidaka H; Eto T; Maehara N; Jimi S; Hotokezaka M; Chijiiwa K Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):2269-72. PubMed ID: 19260520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the UICC/AJCC 1992 and 1997 pN categories for gastric cancer patients after surgery. Wu CW; Hsieh MC; Lo SS; Shen KH; Lui WY; P'eng FK Hepatogastroenterology; 2001; 48(37):279-84. PubMed ID: 11268985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Relationship between metastatic rate and amount of lymph nodes and prognosis of gastric cancer]. Li K; Xu HM; Chen JQ Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 85(30):2113-6. PubMed ID: 16313820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems. Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The study of the minimum number of examined lymph nodes for the TNM classification of gastric cancer]. Chen B; Sun JY; Jin F; Xu HM; Wang SB Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 43(11):702-5. PubMed ID: 16008956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma. Celen O; Yildirim E; Berberoglu U J Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 96(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17443727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection. Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer? Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients. Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification. Omejc M; Juvan R; Jelenc F; Repse S Int Surg; 2001; 86(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11890334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reappraisal of the new UICC staging system for gastric cancer: problem in lymph node stage. Lee WJ; Hong RL; Lai IR; Chen CN; Lee PH; Chung KC Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(45):860-4. PubMed ID: 12064008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of level and number of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Saito H; Fukumoto Y; Osaki T; Fukuda K; Tatebe S; Tsujitani S; Ikeguchi M Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1688-93. PubMed ID: 17245613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is metastatic lymph node ratio superior to the number of metastatic lymph nodes to assess outcome and survival of gastric cancer? Bilici A; Ustaalioglu BB; Gumus M; Seker M; Yilmaz B; Kefeli U; Yildirim E; Sonmez B; Salepci T; Kement M; Mayadagli A Onkologie; 2010; 33(3):101-5. PubMed ID: 20215800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcome indicators of stage II gastric cancer according to the Japanese classification of gastric cancer. Ojima H; Araki K; Kato T; Okamura K; Manda R; Hirayama I; Hosouchi Y; Nishida Y; Kuwano H Anticancer Res; 2006; 26(2B):1385-90. PubMed ID: 16619548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]