154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9477265)
1. Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Kacl GM; Liu P; Debatin JF; Garzoli E; Caduff RF; Krestin GP
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 9477265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Occhiato R; Venditti F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16126926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MRI and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MRI with mammography and ultrasound for the detection of breast cancer.
Gilbert FJ; van den Bosch HC; Petrillo A; Siegmann K; Heverhagen JT; Panizza P; Gehl HB; Pediconi F; Diekmann F; Peng WJ; Ma L; Sardanelli F; Belli P; Corcione S; Zechmann CM; Faivre-Pierret M; Martincich L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1272-86. PubMed ID: 25006633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease.
Turkat TJ; Klein BD; Polan RL; Richman RH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 7949682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions.
Boné B; Péntek Z; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):489-96. PubMed ID: 9240665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Fobben ES; Rubin CZ; Kalisher L; Dembner AG; Seltzer MH; Santoro EJ
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 7784558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography.
Gribbestad IS; Nilsen G; Fjøsne HE; Kvinnsland S; Haugen OA; Rinck PA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(3):477-80. PubMed ID: 8061451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.
Xing D; Lv Y; Sun B; Xie H; Dong J; Hao C; Chen Q; Chi X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 30531546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benign versus malignant breast disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and Tc-99m tetrofosmin scintimammography.
Fenlon HM; Phelan NC; O'Sullivan P; Tierney S; Gorey T; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9314988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography: improved lesion detection and differentiation with gadobenate dimeglumine.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Padula S; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G; Passariello R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1339-46. PubMed ID: 18941066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria.
Wedegärtner U; Bick U; Wörtler K; Rummeny E; Bongartz G
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1645-50. PubMed ID: 11511885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
