These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9477505)

  • 1. Evaluation of a composite method for counting helminth eggs in cattle faeces.
    Ward MP; Lyndal-Murphy M; Baldock FC
    Vet Parasitol; 1997 Dec; 73(1-2):181-7. PubMed ID: 9477505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cattle gastrointestinal nematode egg-spiked faecal samples: high recovery rates using the Mini-FLOTAC technique.
    Amadesi A; Bosco A; Rinaldi L; Cringoli G; Claerebout E; Maurelli MP
    Parasit Vectors; 2020 May; 13(1):230. PubMed ID: 32375871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An assessment of a composite sampling method for counting strongyle eggs in sheep faeces.
    Baldock FC; Lyndal-Murphy M; Pearse B
    Aust Vet J; 1990 May; 67(5):165-7. PubMed ID: 2378599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical variability and required sample size of helminth egg isolation procedures: revisited.
    Morrison DA
    Parasitol Res; 2004 Nov; 94(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 15549384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of a composite faecal egg count procedure in diagnostic parasitology.
    Nicholls J; Obendorf DL
    Vet Parasitol; 1994 Apr; 52(3-4):337-42. PubMed ID: 8073617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and precision of McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC egg counting techniques using egg-spiked faeces of chickens and two different flotation fluids.
    Daş G; Klauser S; Stehr M; Tuchscherer A; Metges CC
    Vet Parasitol; 2020 Jul; 283():109158. PubMed ID: 32544762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparison of FLOTAC, FECPAK and McMaster techniques for nematode egg counts in cattle.
    Bosco A; Rinaldi L; Maurelli MP; Musella V; Coles GC; Cringoli G
    Acta Parasitol; 2014 Oct; 59(4):625-8. PubMed ID: 25236271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bias, accuracy and precision of faecal egg count reduction test results in cattle using McMaster, Cornell-Wisconsin and FLOTAC egg counting methods.
    Levecke B; Rinaldi L; Charlier J; Maurelli MP; Bosco A; Vercruysse J; Cringoli G
    Vet Parasitol; 2012 Aug; 188(1-2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22503038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Counting coccidial oocysts in chicken faeces: a comparative study of a standard McMaster technique and a new rapid method.
    Haug A; Williams RB; Larsen S
    Vet Parasitol; 2006 Mar; 136(3-4):233-42. PubMed ID: 16388903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantifying the sources of variability in equine faecal egg counts: implications for improving the utility of the method.
    Denwood MJ; Love S; Innocent GT; Matthews L; McKendrick IJ; Hillary N; Smith A; Reid SW
    Vet Parasitol; 2012 Aug; 188(1-2):120-6. PubMed ID: 22469484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a simple sedimentation method (modified McMaster) for diagnosis of bovine fascioliosis.
    Conceição MA; Durão RM; Costa IH; da Costa JM
    Vet Parasitol; 2002 May; 105(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 11983308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of age-clustered pooled faecal samples for monitoring worm control in horses.
    Eysker M; Bakker J; van den Berg M; van Doorn DC; Ploeger HW
    Vet Parasitol; 2008 Feb; 151(2-4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18037244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the detection of anthelmintic resistance: evaluation of faecal egg count reduction test procedures suitable for farm routines.
    Calvete C; Uriarte J
    Vet Parasitol; 2013 Sep; 196(3-4):438-52. PubMed ID: 23537948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effect of distribution of eggs of strongyles and Parascaris equorum in faecal samples of horses on detection with a combined sedimentation-flotation method].
    Kuhnert-Paul Y; Schmäschke R; Daugschies A
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2012; 40(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22331287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calibration and diagnostic accuracy of simple flotation, McMaster and FLOTAC for parasite egg counts in sheep.
    Rinaldi L; Coles GC; Maurelli MP; Musella V; Cringoli G
    Vet Parasitol; 2011 May; 177(3-4):345-52. PubMed ID: 21216533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical variability and required sample size of helminth egg isolation procedures.
    Mes TH
    Vet Parasitol; 2003 Aug; 115(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 12944044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of accuracy and precision of a smartphone based automated parasite egg counting system in comparison to the McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC methods.
    Scare JA; Slusarewicz P; Noel ML; Wielgus KM; Nielsen MK
    Vet Parasitol; 2017 Nov; 247():85-92. PubMed ID: 29080771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Freezing of sheep faeces invalidates Haemonchus contortus faecal egg counts by the McMaster technique.
    Van Wyk JA; Van Wyk L
    Onderstepoort J Vet Res; 2002 Dec; 69(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 12625382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precision, repeatability and representative ability of faecal egg counts in Heterakis gallinarum infected chickens.
    Daş G; Savaş T; Kaufmann F; Idris A; Abel H; Gauly M
    Vet Parasitol; 2011 Dec; 183(1-2):87-94. PubMed ID: 21802853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of modifications of the McMaster method for the enumeration of Ascaris suum eggs in pig faecal samples.
    Pereckiene A; Kaziūnaite V; Vysniauskas A; Petkevicius S; Malakauskas A; Sarkūnas M; Taylor MA
    Vet Parasitol; 2007 Oct; 149(1-2):111-6. PubMed ID: 17703889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.